Well they're on the same side aren't they.
That doesn't make them a racist or far right, but you knew that.
Lol.
You do realise that it’s stuff like this that actually helps and pushes people towards these far right groups ?
Well they're on the same side aren't they.
That doesn't make them a racist or far right, but you knew that.
Boss, good to know. Ordering England flags, a 48 case of Carling and 52 tattoos - 24 of them of Lee Rigby - right now. Cheers for clarifying!
Lol.
You do realise that it’s stuff like this that actually helps and pushes people towards these far right groups ?
If they disagree with the message of black lives matter and racial equality, then yes they are.
Ah you mean literally just the words. We're going to pretend there's no movement whatsoever behind those words that is in any way political. We've just imagined it for the last month or so.
Sound.
Lol.
You do realise that it’s stuff like this that actually helps and pushes people towards these far right groups ?
What part of dismantling statues that celebrate oppression do you take issue with for the record?
They're not just words, they are the entire point.
Do you agree with the entire point, that black lives matter?
That we should have racial equality in this country?
According to Hickson, that never happened mate.
But if it did, I've explained it a few times - I think dismantling history instead of accepting it happened and learning from it is a poor course of action. It's a low hanging fruit to make certain people feel better in the short term, something visual so they feel they've achieved something, while putting up barriers to actual social change and equality by alienating people who feel targeting Churchill/Nelson etc. is offensive in it's own right.
According to Hickson, that never happened mate.
But if it did, I've explained it a few times - I think dismantling history instead of accepting it happened and learning from it is a poor course of action. It's a low hanging fruit to make certain people feel better in the short term, something visual so they feel they've achieved something, while putting up barriers to actual social change and equality by alienating people who feel targeting Churchill/Nelson etc. is offensive in it's own right.
Absolutely I agree with those words and the point - yes to those questions, firmly.
I don't, however, agree with the movement using those words as a title for themselves in many aspects.
Which means I'm the new Nick Griffin apparently.
Simple yes or no question.
Do you think black lives matter?
Guess what answer the fascists would give. If you would give the same answer, then there you go.
What are you going on about, using it as a title? The message is the entire bloody point.
And yes, Nick Griffin is against Black Lives Matter.
Of course I think BLM matters, but the likes of my mum, who’s a pensioner, finds it all a bit frightening and disagrees strongly with smashing stuff up and webbing police officers.
I don’t think she’s in any rush to don her best Stone Island gear and head off to protect some statues in London with Tommy and the boys.
What are you going on about, using it as a title? The message is the entire bloody point.
And yes, Nick Griffin is against Black Lives Matter.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.