Current Affairs Liz Truss

Status
Not open for further replies.
If she's getting £125,000 per year, then presumably Cameron, May, and Johnson are getting the same. A million pounds a year wasted on four people who did more than most to wreck the country's economy.
cameron 125k
may 125k
johnson 125k
truss 125k
sunak 125k

625k yearly for these shysters. The galling thing is, they're independently wealthy besides this 'looking after' for 'office'. They've implemented a system that significantly rewards their failures. And why not, there's 'boat people' to blame...
 
cameron 125k
may 125k
johnson 125k
truss 125k
sunak 125k

625k yearly for these shysters. The galling thing is, they're independently wealthy besides this 'looking after' for 'office'. They've implemented a system that significantly rewards their failures. And why not, there's 'boat people' to blame...
Conservative values.
 
cameron 125k
may 125k
johnson 125k
truss 125k
sunak 125k

625k yearly for these shysters. The galling thing is, they're independently wealthy besides this 'looking after' for 'office'. They've implemented a system that significantly rewards their failures. And why not, there's 'boat people' to blame...

And looking into the accounts of much poorer people, absolutely shameless, but then again some people actually go out and vote for these people..
 
cameron 125k
may 125k
johnson 125k
truss 125k
sunak 125k

625k yearly for these shysters. The galling thing is, they're independently wealthy besides this 'looking after' for 'office'. They've implemented a system that significantly rewards their failures. And why not, there's 'boat people' to blame...
I blame Labour. None of these grifters would have been elected had Labour kept their promise in 1997 to revamp the electoral system. As soon as Blair got his majority, he was quick to renege on that one and abandon the Lib Dems. As long as the UK has an undemocratic system that rewards parties without a majority of the vote with vast majorities of the seats, then the likes of Johnson and Truss are free to wreak havoc.
 
I blame Labour. None of these grifters would have been elected had Labour kept their promise in 1997 to revamp the electoral system. As soon as Blair got his majority, he was quick to renege on that one and abandon the Lib Dems. As long as the UK has an undemocratic system that rewards parties without a majority of the vote with vast majorities of the seats, then the likes of Johnson and Truss are free to wreak havoc.

We had the chance of political reform back in 2011, I voted for it to change but it wasn't succesful.
 
It wouldn't have done anything positive, and may even have led to worse outcomes. The party system is the problem, not the voting system.
You mean the whip system where an MP has to vote according to party instructions rather that following the mood of their constituents?
 
You mean the whip system where an MP has to vote according to party instructions rather that following the mood of their constituents?

That is a big part of it, but also the selection of MPs and how we the electorate are deliberately encouraged to see MPs as essentially proxies for the party leader.
 

Liz Truss as “About as much use as a marzipan dildo,”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top