My take on the game.
1) we are reletively lucky Barry was still on the pitch. Considering our players have been sent off for much less in these games.
2) Liverpool were the better team. They weren't a good team, just better than us...because.....
3) tactically we were terrible. enough has been said of the obvious luakaku positioning but the fact we had ineffective naismith and clearly not a winger lukakau to create chances yet they couldnt do either of their roles. nothing against them , they arent cut out to play them, so why we persist i don't know.
4) Ok Hibbert didnt do terribly, but i feel browning would have been a better choice for getting forward. The fact tony went off proves this as he wasnt adding anyhting to the team and browning vs sterling would have one winner.
5) I think it was one of those games where if either side lost then the fans would be saying fair enough. If we lost then fair enough they played better. If they lost then fair enough we were awful in front of goal etc
so yeah, the derby in a nutshell. Not the best game and clearly too teams in poor form not wanting to lose the game. I feel martinez is being too niaeve with his selections as he needs to drop naismith or lukaku and get some sort of system like last year going. playing them both out of their position is not helping us at all, luakaku as CF and naismith to drift round and get into those spaces in the box.