Dont want to get into Yes/No debate (my views are well documented), but getting fed up with people (of both sides), using half truths as fact
pete, i want to believe... but to quote knowsley council "[the stadium] being of poor design quality."
Just read the toffee web article, were does it say the council thought it was of poor design?
Ahead of the meeting of Knowsley's Planning Committee on Monday to approve the Tesco application, a 462 page Agenda and Report has been prepared by the Planning Office for the committee members.
It contains the following passage: "Stadium – the building has been criticised by some consultees and local community representations as being of poor design quality. It has to be acknowledged that the design adopted here, in contrast to some recent stadium proposals, is not one for an iconic exemplar building. Rather, the design is a somewhat more traditional stadium design with four separate stands and this shows in its outward appearance. Indeed, a somewhat utilitarian and cost-conscious design is evident in the way that the underside of the upper stands is revealed to outward view."
this does not read to me as the council are saying it, just reporting concerns from some consultees and local representations.
we moan that we want all the information, but when they were honest enough to give it, we moan!
Stroll on three weeks......
If yes, great, stop moaning, stop bitching, dont gloat, get it built
If no, great, stop moaning, stop bitching, dont gloat, move on