To be serious, when he sticks to subjects he’s actually qualified to talk about (I.e. clinical psychology), his advice is fairly non-controversial and generally fine, almost bland really. General self-help stuff that’s been around for ages.
When he moves outside his area of expertise into politics, religion, social studies etc, he becomes incredibly vague and frustrating, relying on being overly verbose, dressing topics up in metaphor, and equivocating terms to the point of meaninglessness.
Obviously has gone completely off the rails in the last year or two, with health and family issues, and genuinely (to me, at least) seems extremely vulnerable and ‘on the edge’. Not sure he’s someone who is well suited to being in the public eye, particularly for someone who employs the style of polemic that he does, which inevitably attracts criticism, but he’s now sitting on such a goldmine of money, that it seems he’s going to continue down that road.