Joleon Lescott

[chicoazul]

True.

Lescott has said something that is bloody obvious. With that kind of money City are going to sign players who have won trophies, they have the money. The fact they hadn't when he was signed doesn't mean they weren't going to.

Keep digging mate.

 

[chicoazul]

Well we don't know what he was promised do we? But fairly safe to assume that an owner with too much money is going to yield more quality than an owner with no money.

What do you think of Newcastle in the 90s mate?

 

[kenada_blue]

but if phil neville was to sign for City (feel free if your reading phil), he would be the worst player in their squad.

phil neville won alot of his medals of the bench, fact.

But he's talking about experience of winning trophies...he's had more experience and played in those games. That's a fact.

Oh and Saha.

 

[GhostOfDixie]

What do you think of Newcastle in the 90s mate?

How can you expect me to answer any of your questions if you don't answer mine? I'll answer yours but how about you answer mine and we can have a sensible discussion.

 

[Allezfan]

I voted no way - we must keep him at the club. He's way to good a defender to give to City. They'll be sooooo good with him. And who could we get with £18-£20 million?

That would be a lot funnier if they didn't already have 7 more points than us and hadn't finished three places above us last year.

 

[chicoazul]

How can you expect me to answer any of your questions if you don't answer mine? I'll answer yours but how about you answer mine and we can have a sensible discussion.

What was your question mate?

 

[GhostOfDixie]

What was your question mate?

If you got offered 4 or 5 times more money to work somewhere else, in plusher surroundings, with better skilled work colleagues, more potential for rewards and so on. Would you?

 

[kenada_blue]

Well we don't know what he was promised do we? But fairly safe to assume that an owner with too much money is going to yield more quality than an owner with no money.

But you're moving past the point -

He said that Everton, when he left last season, "were probably just a bit short of experience in winning trophies"

Now pull up players in Citeh's squad last season who had experience in winning trophies?

Tevez, Toure, and Bridge.

So I guess you believe those 3 players make a difference to a winning team and a losing team.

 

[Allezfan]

But he's talking about experience of winning trophies...he's had more experience and played in those games. That's a fact.

Oh and Saha.

Howard won a pair of cups too.

 

[GhostOfDixie]

But you're moving past the point -

He said that Everton, when he left last season, "were probably just a bit short of experience in winning trophies"

Now pull up players in Citeh's squad last season who had experience in winning trophies?

Tevez, Toure, and Bridge.

So I guess you believe those 3 players make a difference to a winning team and a losing team.

Do you not think he thought that City would be signing world class players?

 

[kenada_blue]

Howard won a pair of cups too.

But not as many as Wayne Bridge...so Citeh have more experience according to Joe.

 

[Allezfan]

Howard won a pair of cups too.

Oh and Fellaini won the belgium league. He's still right about our squad in general.

 

[chicoazul]

If you got offered 4 or 5 times more money to work somewhere else, in plusher surroundings, with better skilled work colleagues, more potential for rewards and so on. Would you?

Was he offered four or five times more money mate? Is football a normal occupation where these rules apply?

How was it plusher surroundings? How were his new colleagues better skilled when we had finished above them when he made the move?


Do my questions answer your questions mate?

 

[chicoazul]

Oh and Fellaini won the belgium league. He's still right about our squad in general.

Saha lid.


thinks some more*

 

[kenada_blue]

Do you not think he thought that City would be signing world class players?

And he'd be warming the bench?

Then, yeah.

So basically he's done the old "I came here to win things and not the money" speech but worded it differently?