Joleon Lescott

Sell Lescott?

  • Yes, for £18m to £20m - with all money being given to Moyes to spend

    Votes: 116 45.0%
  • No way - we must keep him at the club.

    Votes: 142 55.0%

  • Total voters
    258
Status
Not open for further replies.
So that's Martyn, Lawro, Hanson, Sharpey, and 'Arry Redknapp.

It is saying something when people either with contacts at the club or are still involved in the club are saying to sell. They must have an insider view of what is going on and the damage it's doing.

Moyes will not want to lose face though, and whatever happens it will be on his terms.

Get rid and move on Davey, we'll still love ya!
 

I do think Moyes should slap £25mill on his head, like he should've done from the get go, and see what Citeh do. Rumour is that now they wont go above £18million. Joke that is.

I think I might agree, perhaps it's best for all concerned if City are left in the knowledge that £25m is the price, and not a penny less. I think Bill should be the one to tell them, too.

I think both clubs are fed up now, so I can see City just caving in and going for it.

But what do I know, eh? :)
 
I think I might agree, perhaps it's best for all concerned if City are left in the knowledge that £25m is the price, and not a penny less. I think Bill should be the one to tell them, too.

I think both clubs are fed up now, so I can see City just caving in and going for it.

But what do I know, eh? :)

I've always stuck by the fact they wont pay £25mill. £22mill at a push but the rumour is they're sticking with £18mill and offering a player.

Being a bit sensible...I know Dunne is proper [Poor language removed] but get at least £20mill from them and Dunne to cover which leaves us with about £18mill to spend (10% to wolves). Get Senderos on the cheap and 2 players in (right back in Taylor for £8mill, right winger), even a couple of loans including a left back and a DM. It seems better.

We'll have 4 centre halves then when Jags comes back. I dont know about you but at least 2 of them will be ace and at least sounds as strong as Villa's or Spurs back 4.
 
I've always stuck by the fact they wont pay £25mill. £22mill at a push but the rumour is they're sticking with £18mill and offering a player.

Being a bit sensible...I know Dunne is proper [Poor language removed] but get at least £20mill from them and Dunne to cover which leaves us with about £18mill to spend (10% to wolves). Get Senderos on the cheap and 2 players in (right back in Taylor for £8mill, right winger), even a couple of loans including a left back and a DM. It seems better.

We'll have 4 centre halves then when Jags comes back. I dont know about you but at least 2 of them will be ace and at least sounds as strong as Villa's or Spurs back 4.

Looking at that horrible forum Bluemoon, and it seems that Dunne is the player they want rid of the most. He's their Phil Neville.

Maybe Petrov would move us on a bit? But he's just a bit old isn't he?

I'm soooo bored with whole thing to be frank, Ken.

Sort it Davey, NOW!
 
Looking at that horrible forum Bluemoon, and it seems that Dunne is the player they want rid of the most. He's their Phil Neville.

Maybe Petrov would move us on a bit? But he's just a bit old isn't he?

I'm soooo bored with whole thing to be frank, Ken.

Sort it Davey, NOW!

Same here mate.

I just want something sorted, players in, and everyone concentrating on the league. So far its not happening.

And yes, Dunne is awful. Really bad. I think he and Titus Brambles swapped genes last season because ones turned out pretty solid, the other was solid then turned awful.

They'd be laughing at the deal to be fair. Money to burn and a [Poor language removed] player gone. Win, Win for them.
 

Looking at that horrible forum Bluemoon, and it seems that Dunne is the player they want rid of the most. He's their Phil Neville.

Maybe Petrov would move us on a bit? But he's just a bit old isn't he?

I'm soooo bored with whole thing to be frank, Ken.

Sort it Davey, NOW!

Any player City offer will have been deemed not good enough to play for City , so if they aren't good enough for a small team like City , how can they be good enough for a big team like Everton ? :lol:

And for all the Mooner lads watching this thread , such as Svennis Penis and that other deluded prat Stony , here's what we think of your offer (y)

wipeasswithcitybadge-2.jpg


For delusions of grandeur click here : View topic - Lescott [Merged] - Manchester City Forum - Bluemoon-MCFC
 
Last edited:
Could it be that their sugar daddy has spat his dummy out and decided not to fund any more players after seeing the quality of signings so far ?
They're more skint than we are now . :lol:
 
cheeky get

English Angle: Football's Food Chain - Are Everton Right To Deny Joleon Lescott His Manchester City Move?

Goal.com's Paul Macdonald considers whether or not it's time for the Toffees to allow Lescott to move to Eastlands...

18 Aug 2009 11:30:00


49892_news.jpg
Photo Gallery
Zoom

England Press Conference: Joleon Lescott (PA)
Related Links

Teams


Players



While this particular transfer saga has a considerable length to travel before it rivals that of one Cristiano Ronaldo, the protracted deal to take Joleon Lescott to Manchester City from Everton is swiftly establishing itself as the will he/won't he deal of the English Premier League close season.

Unless you've been hiding behind a huge billboard of Carlos Tevez, you won't have been able to avoid the remarkable transformation of the Citizens from cash-strapped side tormented by Red Devils to world superpower with infinite resources. It's testament to the capitalist nature of the modern game that a cash injection can mean attracting players who would previously have shown no interest in the light blue jersey. That fact isn't likely to change any time soon - and on that basis alone Manchester City have to be considered one of the biggest clubs around.

They have joined that elite group, that higher echelon of power brokers, peering down on the rest whilst flashing their wad. They have ambitions of grandeur and the means to transform their vision into reality. They can now at least bid for players of Kaka's quality and aim to conquer the world.

Moreover, Mark Hughes is building a team, strengthening shrewdly in key areas of the pitch; and he sees Joleon Lescott as the missing piece of his defensive puzzle. The England defender has begged Everton boss David Moyes to let him speak to City - a request which was succinctly rejected, and one which prompted Moyes to lambast City and Hughes for approaching one of his most treasured assets.

What the Scotsman would do well to heed, however, is that in the summer of 2006 he approached Wolverhampton Wanderers in a similar fashion. He dangled a carrot in front of the then Championship side, and in front of Lescott, who was desperate to take a step up football's food chain.

City's sudden jump in status means that, despite what league positions and heritage may have you believe, they are now a bigger club than Everton. The Toffees, then, may be acting in a hypocritical manner by not only accusing their rivals of a 'lack of respect', but by standing in the way of a player who has exhausted the benefits of playing at Goodison Park.

27677_hp.jpg

Lescott celebrates happier times at Goodison

Moyes, despite the Arsenal thrashing, has performed minor miracles on a modest budget on Merseyside, building a supremely organised outfit who are very difficult to beat, this establishing himself as a serious contender to replace Sir Alex Ferguson once his countryman's tenure at Manchester United comes to an end.

But there are no billionaire Sheikh's coffers to raid; there will be no £20 million striker arriving; there is unfortunately no other outcome than Everton finishing lower in the table this season.

Whether City's spending has the desired result of Champions League football next season is irrelevant; Lescott is only 26, and he has the opportunity to be a key component in a 'Chel-ski' like revolution which he would be foolish to ignore. The prospect of doubled wages would clearly sweeten the deal, and Everton need to realise that bank balances are crucial at this level.

Wolves didn't want to lose Lescott, who had just signed a new contract to remain at Molineux in 2006, but they were forced to bow to indefatigable player and financial pressures. Yes, there was a division between the two at the time: City will now consider finishing outside of the top six as abject failure, meaning they are attempting to directly displace the Merseyside club from their fifth-place perch. Still, Everton risk being lumbered with an unsettled defender when both his fans and his colleagues know he'd rather be elsewhere.

The 6-1 humbling at the hands of an Arsenal side still considered by many to be incapable of a title challenge hints that Everton are heading in the wrong direction. They defended woefully, while Lescott's mannerisms and demeanour were those of a man whose mind is elsewhere.

Everton must learn their place, and allow Lescott to blossom at a 'bigger' club, where the opportunities are as limitless as the zeroes on City's cheques.
 

Could it be that their sugar daddy has spat his dummy out and decided not to fund any more players after seeing the quality of signings so far ?
They're more skint than we are now . :lol:

i think part of what you say is right mate because our chairman said before the window opened that we wouldnt pay over the odds for players.

then he pays £25m for adebayor lol but i think that could be worth it in the end but reading through todays posts on here the general feeling seems to be let him got for £25m ?????

well i think that might well happen including add on's and stuff and as someone pointed out in the MUEN today its reported the 3 players that are up for grabs are dunne,petrov and jo.

well if i had to take one of them i would take petrov everytime because the fella is class and still has loads to offer and is only 30.

it all seems to have gone quiet on the lescott front and ive a feeling it wont happen now because it doesnt leave much time for yourselves to get players in either.
 
English Angle: Football's Food Chain - Are Everton Right To Deny Joleon Lescott His Manchester City Move?

Goal.com's Paul Macdonald considers whether or not it's time for the Toffees to allow Lescott to move to Eastlands...

18 Aug 2009 11:30:00


49892_news.jpg
Photo Gallery
Zoom

England Press Conference: Joleon Lescott (PA)
Related Links

Teams


Players


While this particular transfer saga has a considerable length to travel before it rivals that of one Cristiano Ronaldo, the protracted deal to take Joleon Lescott to Manchester City from Everton is swiftly establishing itself as the will he/won't he deal of the English Premier League close season.

Unless you've been hiding behind a huge billboard of Carlos Tevez, you won't have been able to avoid the remarkable transformation of the Citizens from cash-strapped side tormented by Red Devils to world superpower with infinite resources. It's testament to the capitalist nature of the modern game that a cash injection can mean attracting players who would previously have shown no interest in the light blue jersey. That fact isn't likely to change any time soon - and on that basis alone Manchester City have to be considered one of the biggest clubs around.

They have joined that elite group, that higher echelon of power brokers, peering down on the rest whilst flashing their wad. They have ambitions of grandeur and the means to transform their vision into reality. They can now at least bid for players of Kaka's quality and aim to conquer the world.

Moreover, Mark Hughes is building a team, strengthening shrewdly in key areas of the pitch; and he sees Joleon Lescott as the missing piece of his defensive puzzle. The England defender has begged Everton boss David Moyes to let him speak to City - a request which was succinctly rejected, and one which prompted Moyes to lambast City and Hughes for approaching one of his most treasured assets.

What the Scotsman would do well to heed, however, is that in the summer of 2006 he approached Wolverhampton Wanderers in a similar fashion. He dangled a carrot in front of the then Championship side, and in front of Lescott, who was desperate to take a step up football's food chain.

City's sudden jump in status means that, despite what league positions and heritage may have you believe, they are now a bigger club than Everton. The Toffees, then, may be acting in a hypocritical manner by not only accusing their rivals of a 'lack of respect', but by standing in the way of a player who has exhausted the benefits of playing at Goodison Park.

27677_hp.jpg

Lescott celebrates happier times at Goodison


Moyes, despite the Arsenal thrashing, has performed minor miracles on a modest budget on Merseyside, building a supremely organised outfit who are very difficult to beat, this establishing himself as a serious contender to replace Sir Alex Ferguson once his countryman's tenure at Manchester United comes to an end.

But there are no billionaire Sheikh's coffers to raid; there will be no £20 million striker arriving; there is unfortunately no other outcome than Everton finishing lower in the table this season.

Whether City's spending has the desired result of Champions League football next season is irrelevant; Lescott is only 26, and he has the opportunity to be a key component in a 'Chel-ski' like revolution which he would be foolish to ignore. The prospect of doubled wages would clearly sweeten the deal, and Everton need to realise that bank balances are crucial at this level.

Wolves didn't want to lose Lescott, who had just signed a new contract to remain at Molineux in 2006, but they were forced to bow to indefatigable player and financial pressures. Yes, there was a division between the two at the time: City will now consider finishing outside of the top six as abject failure, meaning they are attempting to directly displace the Merseyside club from their fifth-place perch. Still, Everton risk being lumbered with an unsettled defender when both his fans and his colleagues know he'd rather be elsewhere.

The 6-1 humbling at the hands of an Arsenal side still considered by many to be incapable of a title challenge hints that Everton are heading in the wrong direction. They defended woefully, while Lescott's mannerisms and demeanour were those of a man whose mind is elsewhere.

Everton must learn their place, and allow Lescott to blossom at a 'bigger' club, where the opportunities are as limitless as the zeroes on City's cheques.


I think someone needs to put a nice little complaint into that site because that has to be one of the worst articles I've ever read.

Look at the facts under Moyes - Net Spend of something like £24.4m (2002-2008)
Carling Cup Semi Final
FA Cup Final
Finished 4th, and 2 consecutive 5th place finishes.
3 consecutive Uefa Cup qualfiers. 1 Champions League qualifier.
As a club -
9 League Titles
5 FA Cups
9 Chairty Shields
1 European Cup Winners Cup




Man Citeh - Religated 1996, 2001.
£50.6million spent on transfers 2007-2008 - finshed 9th.
£102.5mill spent on transfers 2008-2009 - finished 10th
Have spent a total of £194million under Mark Hughes. £244million since 2007.

As a club
2 League Titles
4 FA Cups
2 League Cups
3 Charity Shields
1 European Cup Winners Cup.


So....Man Citeh have been a BIG club since 2008. Paying a player £100k a week makes clubs massive nowdays.

Ah well.

Dont mind it to be fair. There's only 3 big clubs in England - Arsenal, Man United, and Liverpool. Anyone who's says different are a bit silly.
 
Last edited:
He's an idiot, move on.

Anyone who thinks money is an indication of the size of a football club doesn't understand the game.
 
Don't waste your time over it, City are using the media to make things happen for them, they could be as dirty as they want, see if it makes any difference, they would not get there man this summer.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top