John Stones' Value

TheFinnFan · July 21, 2015

Boss_Blue said:
You don't have to be sneaky mate.

*bends over and holds cheeks apart

Scoooooorrrrr

* back to topic STONES ISNT GOOOOING KOFF MO

Toffeelover · July 21, 2015

We had to pay 28 mill for Rom. I rate Stones way higher than Rom and voted accordingly.

WarringtonBlue · July 21, 2015

I said 40-45 because I think if he goes that's what he'll go for + add ons etc. To us he is priceless. Or £60million

bluestevon · July 21, 2015

Best English Centre back in the richest league by a million miles, Best young English player in a league where the rich teams are struggling for the home grown quota, £50m for a woeful Brazilian, £49 million for a utter [Poor language removed] with zero moral character and a reputation for beating up girls, start at those figures and double it.

Efcjake · July 21, 2015

I've just the read the Mourinho comments so I would like to add an addendum.

*Chelsea can get to ****

Bilko · July 21, 2015

I don't see a price that would be acceptable to be honest, it only changes if john Stones asks to go, then it's 60 million + add ons.

but if we agree to sell then the message to the rest of the league will be catastrophic for the immediate future of the club

Tree13 · July 21, 2015

Toast said:
£28m PLUS Patrick Bamford.

Hi Jose

No.

Verbal Kint · July 21, 2015

This thread has upset me

McBain · July 22, 2015

Its the first time I've looked at a player and realised the figures just don't add up.

Rooney at the time - gutted but look at that money.
Lescott and Felli - well we got value out of them for a few years before they went so its well played to the club.

But with Stones, different than say Barkley in a way- any amount of money just doesn't seem worth it.

30, 40, 50... Silly money doesn't seem to equate to what we'd achieve by keeping him.

deipnosophist · July 22, 2015

McBain said:
Its the first time I've looked at a player and realised the figures just don't add up.

Rooney at the time - gutted but look at that money.
Lescott and Felli - well we got value out of them for a few years before they went so its well played to the club.

But with Stones, different than say Barkley in a way- any amount of money just doesn't seem worth it.

30, 40, 50... Silly money doesn't seem to equate to what we'd achieve by keeping him.

Totally agree. Everton's balance sheet is certainly no longer 'creditor vulnerable'...so what price a player who represents the future of the club? To be honest, despite GOT's resident worry warts' clamorings to the contrary, I genuinely believe the powers that be at EFC are equally aware of this. Unless he requests it, Stones won't near time be transferring anywhere*.

*Bottom line though : Everton needs to start being successful.

DexterBlue · July 22, 2015

If stirling is worth £50m then stones is £60m at least. Oh and José add that bamford too.

marsh · July 22, 2015

40mill plus Salah and a few others on permanent from them haha

SaltedPienaarts · July 22, 2015

I just can't imagine him leaving. Is this what it was like when Rooney left?

ilikecheese · July 22, 2015

SaltedPienaarts said:
I just can't imagine him leaving. Is this what it was like when Rooney left?

No mate...everyone was on dialup back then...

Phenom · July 22, 2015

SaltedPienaarts said:
I just can't imagine him leaving. Is this what it was like when Rooney left?

For me personally no, Rooney was talked about for years as a teenager coming through and being a top class player. He finally gets there and then we ship him off, I was devastated but then I was also a young lad.

Stones has only really been talked about for the last 2 years max but I think it will be a similar feeling due to his massive potential and the fact we all see him as our future captain for years to come.