Pabbers
Player Valuation: £60m
Forster is number 3 england keeper, hart and butland much much better.
- Status
Forster is number 3 england keeper, hart and butland much much better.
Still think Hart is better than Forster. Hart has had a shambles in front of him for City for the past few years and has singlehandedly kept them in big games. He does have a rick in him but he also has some absolute worldies in him that there are few others capable of. I view Forster as a steady eddie. Butland is the one if we go english and are looking for a permanent signing. In my opinion is better than both the others already and get him in now and he solves our problems for 10 years.
There's probably loads. I'm not a football manager or a scout, but I do know that Joe Hart for £25m+ and £110k+ wages would be a severe gamble.
There'll be loads of prospective top class keepers on the continent - the likes of Neuer started at Schalke, Buffon at Parma, Courtois at Genk - just because 'keepers out there aren't household names now, doesn't mean they won't be.
MartyMcFly
Player Valuation: £15m
One game is not form.
Stoke aren't selling mate, not this summer and not to us
It's one more than Hart's played so far this season
That's not what you said though.
You said better options for half the price, nothing you've said above proves that theory. Neuer went to Bayern for 22 million Euros, a player in his position would never have joined Everton.
Courtois went for 9 million euros, and at the time would not have been considered as good as Hart is now.
Buffon went to Juventus for 50 million euros....
We cannot get the same as Hart for half the price. We could get a player with potential for half the price, but that's a totally different scenario.
Hart is proven quality, quite how you think a two time PL winner and former keeper of the year being a gamble is beyond me. It's as much of a non-gamble as you can get.
Shane Duffy l o l
It's not though mate
It is a gamble
It's not a MASSIVE one like, but it is still a gamble
Tubes might be right, it might be better to spend less on potential than pay over the odds for decent
Or indeed, those saying he's worth the gamble could be right
It is still a gamble though, especially as he's been poor recently and has been dropped by that same side he won those Two League titles with
This is by no means the sure thing some are suggesting it to be, especially when we still need another striker
Recent poor form. Recent being the key word there. Lukaku has had more poor form in the past two seasons with us than Hart has had in six years.
He's been dropped by a manager who wants a keeper with the footballing ability of an outfield player in goal, to play a specific style. If any other manager had gone there Hart would have stayed number one.
"A gamble"
Jesus wept.
It is a gamble mate, especially if we have to pay a decent wedge to get him, which we probably will
It might turn good, but it's not by any means guaranteed and, considering we're weaker in other positions and Stekky has done well thus far, it's reasonable to suggest maybe looking at spending that money elsewhere
Sorry, but I refuse to let this go, signing him is a gamble
And if we sign him, I'll back him to the hills and back as he's playing for Everton, that still doesn't guarantee he'll be a success
Hence, if we sign him on big money and a big contract it's a gamble
Hence, if we sign him on big money and a big contract it's a gamble
I'm not really bothered if you won't let it go, signing Hart is not a gamble in any way. You're crackers if you think it is.
ijjysmith
Calm
It's only a gamble in the same way signing anyone is a gamble.
Signing Messi would be a gamble.
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
