Current Affairs Joe Biden POTUS #46

[Zatara]

First off I banned you because you asked to be.

Second, we don’t give infractions for being off topic in CA. That said.. @SteveSC even if your were tagged in please refrain from personal insults.

I‘d also suggest you both put each other on ignore.

How did i end up with one from you before?

 

[Goat]

How did i end up with one from you before?

Cos you are a plant pot?

 

[Zatara]

Cos you are a plant pot?

Doesnt make my point incorrect


Zatara,

Your message (George Floyd and Minneapolis Unrest) is considered to be 'off topic'.


Still want to see a Biden vs Trump joust.

Back to the Everton forum i go...tally ho!

 

[BlueTX]

1: If i answer this without mentioning Biden (the thread topic) it will be an excuse for 'someone' to issue me with a warning here for being "off topic" despite the existing ocean of off topic posts (including their own) that they agree with.

2: If i innocently tag people (as you have done here with me) i'll be met with "why have you tagged me? There is no reason to tag me blah blah blah as if its a mortal sin, after theyve posted their latest nonsense GIF or made some 'irrelevant point' which is usually a totally pointless chart with some nonsense message related in no way to the thread topic 'Biden'.

3: There will be abusive / nasty comments towards me from numerous posters. Those who rant about 'tolerance', 'understanding' and suchlike but cant see the irony....these posts will be offtopic as well of course....not a peep about Biden.

Those who fall under any of these 3 general categories will all then like each others nasty posts about me, cheer any element of abuse or simply openly mock my view to others....nothing about Biden though.

Actually looking at some of the posters and their views in the current affairs forum it seems easier to just ignore them as theyre so massively unpleasant. But then it scrambles up the Everton Forum. Its just a pity certain posters cant just focus on discussing Biden in a polite and interesting manner.

Whats the point of attempting an adult discussion when i would be penalised for replying to questions or abused/bullied for disagreeing politely or offering a different viewpoint...

...to answer your question @BlueTX would mean i would be met with an off topic warning. Numerous abusive and nasty messages and others liking them would soon follow.

It seems to be more trouble than its worth tbh.

On Biden i see Trump has challenged him to a cognative test of some kind. Tbh it seems like both partys support is very 'cultist' when it comes to these two.

I think Biden should challenge Trump to a joust. That would make fantastic television.

...walks back out of the thread before getting warnings / abuse.

I have less than zero interest in your battles with mods. That said, you were tagged because you "liked" the comment by @Death so I wanted your feedback on the matter.

Tbh, if your view is the Dem support of Biden is as cultish as that of GOP support of Tweetie Amin it seems to me your vision is rather blurry.

Is that unpleasant of me?

 

[Zatara]

I have less than zero interest in your battles with mods. That said, you were tagged because you "liked" the comment by @Death so I wanted your feedback on the matter.

Tbh, if your view is the Dem support of Biden is as cultish as that of GOP support of Tweetie Amin it seems to me your vision is rather blurry.

Is that unpleasant of me?

There is no "battle with mods".

Ive explained why i cant respond to your question.

The whole Biden support is quite obtuse in my view and (as referenced earlier) im not particularly interested to comment further on it

The one thing i will say is that its a pity Andrew Yang isnt in this thread to add his views.

 

[RAFUH]

How did i end up with one from you before?

Ya see Zat sometimes folks get on a wind up or are generally being obnoxious, but I forget what forum I’m in and get a bit overzealous. That leads to folks complaining and Danny handing out warnings in mod central....likely because we’ve made him have to deal with complaints. So then, in true GOT fashion, I fly right for a bit until I forget again.

Apologies.

Maybe me and Joe should take the MoCA.

 

[Goat]

Ya see Zat sometimes folks get on a wind up or are generally being obnoxious, but I forget what forum I’m in and get a bit overzealous. That leads to folks complaining and Danny handing out warnings in mod central....likely because we’ve made him have to deal with complaints. So then, in true GOT fashion, I fly right for a bit until I forget again.

Apologies.

Maybe me and Joe should take the MoCA.

Cant believe little snake rats complain to Danny.

 

[Ruairi77]

1: If i answer this without mentioning Biden (the thread topic) it will be an excuse for 'someone' to issue me with a warning here for being "off topic" despite the existing ocean of off topic posts (including their own) that they agree with.

2: If i innocently tag people (as you have done here with me) i'll be met with "why have you tagged me? There is no reason to tag me blah blah blah as if its a mortal sin, after theyve posted their latest nonsense GIF or made some 'irrelevant point' which is usually a totally pointless chart with some nonsense message related in no way to the thread topic 'Biden'.

3: There will be abusive / nasty comments towards me from numerous posters. Those who rant about 'tolerance', 'understanding' and suchlike but cant see the irony....these posts will be offtopic as well of course....not a peep about Biden.

Those who fall under any of these 3 general categories will all then like each others nasty posts about me, cheer any element of abuse or simply openly mock my view to others....nothing about Biden though.

Actually looking at some of the posters and their views in the current affairs forum it seems easier to just ignore them as theyre so massively unpleasant. But then it scrambles up the Everton Forum. Its just a pity certain posters cant just focus on discussing Biden in a polite and interesting manner.

Whats the point of attempting an adult discussion when i would be penalised for replying to questions or abused/bullied for disagreeing politely or offering a different viewpoint...

...to answer your question @BlueTX would mean i would be met with an off topic warning. Numerous abusive and nasty messages and others liking them would soon follow.

It seems to be more trouble than its worth tbh.

On Biden i see Trump has challenged him to a cognative test of some kind. Tbh it seems like both partys support is very 'cultist' when it comes to these two.

I think Biden should challenge Trump to a joust. That would make fantastic television.

...walks back out of the thread before getting warnings / abuse.

On the one hand you’re asking people to talk about Biden in a polite and interesting manner and on the other, you’re running around the thread liking deaths brain numbing wind up posts. Which is it?

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

Tbh it seems like both partys support is very 'cultist' when it comes to these two.

Removed the rest of your post from the quote because it was basically you saying “oh poor widdle victimised me” over and over again...

But to the quoted part, Biden’s support is literally the opposite of cultish. It’s almost entirely pragmatic.

He won the Primary not because he was most people’s ideal candidate, but because he was seen as the best/most likely option to defeat the clear and present danger currently residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

 

[the sniderman]

Ya see Zat sometimes folks get on a wind up or are generally being obnoxious, but I forget what forum I’m in and get a bit overzealous. That leads to folks complaining and Danny handing out warnings in mod central....likely because we’ve made him have to deal with complaints. So then, in true GOT fashion, I fly right for a bit until I forget again.

Apologies.

Maybe me and Joe should take the MoCA.

greetings officer fuh i have completed a v respectful time out from this forum to reduce levels of aggro can u please confirm i am no cleared to return to CRUSH those who fester. any1 but trump go go joe.

 

[Death]

Yep, I bet you do. Instead it's just more tedious waffle.

That is so wity to crop out a part of a sentence and take it as whatever context you want to. That’s twice in a row you did it. What are you going to crop out that I said you are wity next?

so pointing out Biden is notTrump and doing that.Top quality stuff.

 

[Death]

Mate what's your version of our Confederate flag that you aspiring Nazi Youth fly over there?

I’m an Irish Republican so I guess...



If your talking o terms of oppressive flags we fought and removed. Very recently

I’m a socialist by the way.

 

[Death]

I was ignoring him. He decided to publicly declare he would backup Jay in his pursuit of being a wum. He and they weren't even talking about biden nor where they in any conversation.

So I called him out for being pathetic and then again for trying to rat me out.

Any person who goes to a packed beach without a mask who had covid is pathetic.

Any person who continually wants to wind people up is equally pathetic.

I had already asked both he and Jay to put me on ignore and if you look I have barely responded to either since you asked a week or so ago. Jay keeps tagging me and the other fool pipes up soon after.

Why are you involving me in this? I tagged you once last night and your turning it into something weird. And your ratting. Your singing like a canary right there you hypocrite. Stop with the bishy “just but me on ignore” bs reminiscent of a Facebook’are you ok hun? Pm me character. Stop requesting that. I don’t want to ignore you.

 

[RAFUH]

greetings officer fuh i have completed a v respectful time out from this forum to reduce levels of aggro can u please confirm i am no cleared to return to CRUSH those who fester. any1 but trump go go joe.

Lord...night shift aggro and a ginger.

 

[Huyton Layne]

Let's just stop comparing candidates if some of you think they're similar and vote on which party looks after the common man better.
Vote Joe.
Thanks for listening.




Normal people can continue to compare candidates for glaringly obvious differences.