2023/24 Jarrad Branthwaite

[ToffeeScot]

I don’t think Bruno will go, he has just bought a £4m house in the area.

They may be interested but just can’t see it. And there’s zero point in him moving to a team not in Europe.

They'll be in the conference league and with a big chance of winning that too if City beat United. I agree that it's the unlikeliest of all possible options though.

 

[Goat]

Honestly hope he joins United, that way he will be back here on loan within 18months after their clueless fanbase blame him cos they still utter pony.

 

[Zatara]

But he's not da' yoot...gotta' play da yoot. @Zatara

???

 

[Gwladys St. Glory]

???

 

[Zatara]

Was not aware of this (if true of course)

Probably not true

I thought this was widely known. Was mentioned at the time and has been brought up by Carlisle a few times since and also as recently as a few weeks back

Not sure if its 15% though. Thought it was somewhere inside 10-15%

 

[Nymzee]

 

[Wizard]

 

[Gwladys St. Glory]

Go on Tarks.

 

[NathDogg]

Well done Jarred, different class all season.

Hope his form is rewarded by the clueless England manager and he gets some minutes at the euros.

 

[Bedfordblue]

Was not aware of this (if true of course)

Just seen this elsewhere and came here to post it….. I have a hard time believing it’s 15% on top of the original £1m transfer fee.
To think if we did get £80m for him we would have been paying them near £13m!
Sure we’d be profiting to the tune of £67m, but if that 15% is accurate, it looks a little naive in hindsight. I don’t recall there being a lot of competition for him at the time to warrant a sell on that big.
The Architect indeed

 

[Toffeelover]

Dig our heels in and say no sale, find the money through other sales. How are we going to improve if we keep letting our top players go ?

 

[Goat]

Just seen this elsewhere and came here to post it….. I have a hard time believing it’s 15% on top of the original £1m transfer fee.
To think if we did get £80m for him we would have been paying them near £13m!
Sure we’d be profiting to the tune of £67m, but if that 15% is accurate, it looks a little naive in hindsight. I don’t recall there being a lot of competition for him at the time to warrant a sell on that big.
The Architect indeed

How does making a 67m profit on a player seem naive?

Brands has done it again.

 

[Bedfordblue]

How does making a 67m profit on a player seem naive?

Brands has done it again.

I’d prefer we trousered £77m out of £80m
And £3m for an unknown / unproven 17 year old sounds like it would have been an acceptable figure to a league 1 club.
Besides I think it’s unlikely it’s 15% in all honesty.

 

[Zatara]

Just seen this elsewhere and came here to post it….. I have a hard time believing it’s 15% on top of the original £1m transfer fee.
To think if we did get £80m for him we would have been paying them near £13m!
Sure we’d be profiting to the tune of £67m, but if that 15% is accurate, it looks a little naive in hindsight. I don’t recall there being a lot of competition for him at the time to warrant a sell on that big.
The Architect indeed

This is why I have stated £125mil should be the price:

Worth to us now
Value in the future
Sell on

 

[RD2910]

I’d prefer we trousered £77m out of £80m
And £3m for an unknown / unproven 17 year old sounds like it would have been an acceptable figure to a league 1 club.
Besides I think it’s unlikely it’s 15% in all honesty.

I think that's a fairly standard figure for sell-on clauses, I wouldn't bother worrying about it.