I suppose that speculative neither of us has seen the job spec, while media itself is broad concept, is that Club related media or deciding to do a personal print copy piece.
Anyway we could go back and forth and not know either way because we are both speculating and that can vary from DOF to DOF at every club, personally i dont like it personally, i might not be right but just a personal opinion. That said it always helpful to have a stable of friendly journos, so sometimes you have to play the game.
I agree to a large extent. I don't think the DoF should be the main mouthpiece of the club. I think that should be the manager/head coach.
When Brands first took over, he had a lot to say in the media. But I put that down to the fact that he had just taken over a huge job and we had no actual manager at the time. He took control of their first joint press conference when Silva was introduced as manager, and I think he and the club got it exactly right at the time. I fully expected him to then take a back seat and let Silva be the media man and that's exactly what has happened.
Having said that, I don't expect him to have no press involvement whatsoever. He has overall responsibility for player acquisition and football strategy at the club, including development of players. So I would expect him to do at least a couple of media interviews a year, such as the one a couple of months ago when he shed some light on our summer transfer dealings.
I actually believe that between them, they have the media balance just about right at the moment. My one issue is that the club release so little information about the youth set up, including the U23s. I understand the need to be protective of the very young players coming through the system, but their news disclosure on injuries in particular is shocking. As is the coverage of U18 and U23 games compared to most other clubs in the premier.