He was better than gana but it was still a very nothing performance. The midfield was wide open whenever they broke and we never had any sort of control with the ball.Didn't see this at all. He was better than gana today, and he got the move going for our second goal.
QUOTE="EFCINLONDON, post: 12024034, member: 15100"]
Didn't see this at all. He was better than gana today, and he got the move going for our second goal.
Thought he was boss at first but hasnt played out that way has it
not this game tbh just in his general time here…thought he played well first half too but maybe should’ve closed their goalscorer down before half-time.
I like Garner but lolClearly better than Gana
Same but as always i still want more from him thought again alot of his best work was the defensive part. Did alot of covering first and second half, just dont think we have a link in midfield to get it to the attacking three.Just got back from the game. I thought Garner was really good. Weird how we all see it differently
He's the whipping boy for the lads who don't really understand midfieldJust got back from the game. I thought Garner was really good. Weird how we all see it differently
Agree, works hard like Gana(not as good) but not rarely seems to create supply to our attackers. I think a new centre mid with vision is one of our several priorities.Same but as always i still want more from him thought again alot of his best work was the defensive part. Did alot of covering first and second half, just dont think we have a link in midfield to get it to the attacking three.
Seems to have recovered from his back injury which is a plus. In midfield we have a few players who've had fairly long term injuries so maybe unfair to judge them to harshly before they have a full pre-season before Bramley Moor.He's the whipping boy for the lads who don't really understand midfield