2022/23 James Garner

[God Benfrey]

Looks like he will be up against mudryk next who was very active against France.

 

[9LeagueTitles5FACups]

Really think it will be a waste and a complete failure of transfer policy if he's at RWB regularly next season.

He did a great job on the final day but that shouldn't be seen as long term when his quick passing could be good asset in central midfield going forward.

Some of his more positive attacking attributes seem lost at right-back.

 

[TonyT65]

You beat me to it by seconds

Even Goalie is covered , !
Played a charity match once with Alan Harper in goal for us.... was brilliant !!

 

[Terrarian]

Anyone who comes in and solves our long standing RB problem is not wasting his talent.

You're becoming really really tedious now with this Patterson hate.

 

[davek]

You're becoming really really tedious now with this Patterson hate.

Advocating England RB Garner for Everton right back.

Look up paranoia in the dictionary...it's right next to Patterson.

 

[MACCA75]

Don’t really understand these ‘Under 21’ Championships tbh. Both Aarons and Gibbs White are 24 in January.

(Neither were ‘under 21’ when the qualifiers started either btw)

 

[Nymzee]

Don’t really understand these ‘Under 21’ Championships tbh. Both Aarons and Gibbs White are 24 in January.

(Neither were ‘under 21’ when the qualifiers started either btw)

It's a specific date being 21 or under when qual starts.

 

[MACCA75]

It's a specific date being 21 or under when qual starts.

Under 22 then..

 

[MikeH72]

Don’t really understand these ‘Under 21’ Championships tbh. Both Aarons and Gibbs White are 24 in January.

(Neither were ‘under 21’ when the qualifiers started either btw)

They were 21 when it started though weren’t they?

 

[MACCA75]

They were 21 when it started though weren’t they?

They were 21. Which isn’t ‘under 21’ by my maths.

 

[MikeH72]

They were 21. Which isn’t ‘under 21’ by my maths.

Haha no but obviously the under 21s means 21 and under, I thought that was just a given.

 

[Moonlight dribbler]

Haha no but obviously the under 21s means 21 and under, I thought that was just a given.

I am 45 now but remember playing under 7s, unders 9s all the way through to under 19s. You could always play 7 and under, 9 and under, etc and etc. I am so surprised people don't know that.

 

[Caolam]

Back to Garner, my fear is that if he keeps going the way he has been we will be forced to sell him.

 

[MACCA75]

Haha no but obviously the under 21s means 21 and under, I thought that was just a given.

It’s weirdly only a given in football terms.

 

[MikeH72]

It’s weirdly only a given in football terms.

35 being old is only a given in football terms too.