I was reading an article yesterday (https://www.economist.com/britain/2...oals-help-to-tackle-islamophobia-in-liverpool) that looked at new research into Islamaphobia in Britain, and specifically at whether high profile Muslims (Mo Salah in this instance) can help to dampen Islamaphobia.
I don't know how robust the methodology of the research was, but given our personal experience with Steve0 on here, it was noticeable how high the figures were for Everton fans. Obviously you'd probably expect far more negative tweets towards Salah from Everton fans than from other clubs, but this seems to suggest a large number of them refer to his religion in a derogatory way.
Is this something to be worried about you reckon?
They identified British followers of Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and Everton (a Merseyside rival), and analysed 44,000 tweets that mentioned Muslims, Arabs or mosques. In the 14 months after Mr Salah’s transfer, 7.6% of Islam-related tweets by Liverpool fans had negative sentiments, about the same as the 7.3% during the previous three years. But the figure for Everton jumped from 18.6% to 21.3%; for the other teams it rose from 7.1% to 10.9%. Online Islamophobia in Liverpool seems to have been kept in check at a time when it was rising elsewhere. (The researchers found no sign that the broader increase was caused by jealous fans abusing Mr Salah.)
I don't know how robust the methodology of the research was, but given our personal experience with Steve0 on here, it was noticeable how high the figures were for Everton fans. Obviously you'd probably expect far more negative tweets towards Salah from Everton fans than from other clubs, but this seems to suggest a large number of them refer to his religion in a derogatory way.
Is this something to be worried about you reckon?