Initial 10, then reduced to 6 + 2 Point Deductions


The "People are asking..." paragraph is potential dynamite. He seems to be asking the PL to confirm no documentary evidence of internal discussions linking the treatment of Everton with any desire to avoid independent regulation exists. Is he waiting for a denial while holding evidence to the contrary?

Burnham is a heavyweight. Business has just picked up.
 
Last edited:
It is a perfectly normal practice that happens throughout football though. In disciplinary cases the governing body acts as the prosecution and the club appoints lawyers to defend the charge. The IC is in effect the jury.

It is up to the Premier League to come up with aggravating factors and it is up to the club to come up with mitigating factors.
That didn't answer the question at all. The commission is in effect the judge, obviously, as written in the PL handbook. See Burnham's letter for similar questions about the issue.
 

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top