I'm not sure how they could get a deduction of part of the period was spent outside of the PL.
I'm not sure how they could get a deduction of part of the period was spent outside of the PL.
It's not your fault at all mate, and no need for apologies. It's the PL, who have failed.
Same as Forest did. Don’t think today’s ruling changes that. It’s just about WHEN the jurisdiction changes not a fundamental change to any other rules.
I think we have already had a self-imposed 9 point deduction. Surely the PL can see that as a sign of good will?
This appeal seems to establish if part of the process is outside of the PL, it couldn't be counted.
As an aside, I would posit that Forest have an open goal legal case to sue the PL here.
Please share 
chng.it
Fed Up With Favoritism in English Football? Demand Richard Masters' Resignation Now!
%{signature_target} signatures are needed, let’s get there by the end of the day?
chng.it
Their breach was for the cycle up to June 23. The same cycle we were in breach of and received a 8 point deduction. They were a PL club for all that cycle.
The PL didn’t have jurisdiction to do anything in the 23/24 in the EFL and commission ruled today, they don’t have any jurisdiction to do anything 24/25.
Conversely a separate EFL commission found that the EFL didn’t have jurisdiction to look for a business plan from them last Spring.
Essentially and clearly means that the rules can’t be applied for all those competing, amongst the 20 PL clubs and the Championship.
If a precedent has been set that the PL don’t have Jurisdiction over the EFL how can it apply EFL PSR thresholds in the PL.
It even calls into question the integrity of the EFL - if I was getting relegated - I’d spend a fortune from May - June 30th and make sure I came straight back up - absolutely no consequences.
If I was Burnley and Leeds I’d be dropping 150 mill in the championship in Jan to make sure I came up with no consequence.
Essentially it’s one rule for one competing club and different rules for other competing clubs,
Last edited:
And any promoted team, doing what you want..
And look, if your City/Chelsea you might even take relegation, as it means you can then have 4 years where you essentially spend whatever you like with no cummopence.
I saw someone say the PL have 2 options. Either discard PSR, or impose a sanction and dare Leicester to take them to court.
Option 2 would not work, as Leicester would win at court, but it would kick the can down the road.
Just to add, Leeds were selling players, on the proviso that they needed to do so to be compliant. That was false information as per this judgement. They didn't need to do so. So look, there are legal ramifications all over the place.
they'll take the easy option leaving us and forest as th only ones punished and no one else apart from us and forest fans will care so it wont even make the news
I think Forest at least will kick up a fuss. I suspect they do a review, and hope it all goes away.
They probably don't do anymore charges.
I hope they do, its a shitshow from the EPL
Be very interesting to see how our interest legacy issue goes and our approach.
goldfinchmule
Player Valuation: £15m
We will probably put snods and diamond on it.
Similar Threads
-
Everton losses double in latest accounts as 'going concern' threat confirmed- Started by alan ball
- Replies: 198
-
-
