Initial 10, then reduced to 6 + 2 Point Deductions

[matty1878]

They will probably try and hit us with 6 again. Remember they wanted to give us 12 in the first place, so it wouldn't surprise me if that's the total we end up with

but it’s a committee isn’t jt?

 

[arch stanton]

3 for a breach, 3 for it being "significant" which probably means anything over a couple of million

thats a bit different from the 6pts for a breach and a point for every £5m over than we were dikked with. Its almost as if they dont know what they are doing and making it up as they go along

 

[matty1878]

Shows the state of the club for me.

Many have said.

We are being dry bummed aa we ain't a set of Kahunas to go at em.

Fuming

no anything

 

[ashwuk76]

“should”

we have no owners mate nobody cares

As I've said roll out Mr Testicles as our spokesperson. Fitting for the state of all this..

 

[pfim]

Martin Ziegler (Martin with a Y) basically saying it's because Everton provided wrong information. That FOREST got less. Forgive me but first why should any issue surrounding Everton influence how the Independent commission charge Forest?

Secondly, I'm not sure Everton gave incorrect information but what the appeal panel said was even if Everton had not provided the right information it was not for them (PL) to basically speak of as that wasn't their remit.

Thirdly, Everton were cleared of any intentional errors weren't we? The PL speaking of good faith and Everton were cleared of it so why on earth are Forest getting less points than us under this scenario?

Or are they saying well We might have got 3 points but because we provided wrong information that we got 6?

All of this is daft, and pathetic.

What Everton did say both with the original charge and the appeal, that they would monitor other clubs. I suppose with one eye on City. And one on Forest.

Everton should be up in arms about this.

Forest tried to claim more in Covid losses than allowed, so I'm not sure what that guy is talking about.

 

[MikeH72]

They will probably try and hit us with 6 again. Remember they wanted to give us 12 in the first place, so it wouldn't surprise me if that's the total we end up with

How on earth are they going to justify that?

 

[Evertonthat]

but it’s a committee isn’t jt?

Selected by the PL. Little dikkie masters puppets, but yes they are a committee.

 

[pfim]

How on earth are they going to justify that?

The Wheel of Justice hath spoken.

 

[Blast_of_Cannock]

wait didn't we play Arsenal last game of last year too?

How could you forget 'The Duke' saving us?

 

[Victus]

How on earth are they going to justify that?

At this point why not, we're not exactly dealing with any fairness here so we may as well go by 'Everton That'

 

[DualityNSNO]

How on earth are they going to justify that?

We were extra mean in our statement(s) and the fans shouted naughty words.

 

[Davideeyore]

but it’s a committee isn’t jt?

But nothing independent.

I would imagine, Masters has hand picked the IC or given direction like he did with ours but on this occasion to give less than Everton. Just because, he's been
put out with the response from Everton fans. Just because he can and he's untouchable.

 

[Evertonthat]

How on earth are they going to justify that?

Oh I'm sure they will come up with some crap about repeat offending and that we should know better, all while completely ignoring our mitigating factors. They hate us and its pretty clear they don't mind shafting us in public

 

[Goat]

How on earth are they going to justify that?

Justify to who?

They clearly do what they like, when they like.

 

[Wat Tyler]

I'd refuse to kick a ball until they explain themselves.

Think our players have been doing that since about December