Initial 10, then reduced to 6 + 2 Point Deductions

[bluerobert]

Red chairs? No wonder we're in this situation.

Wouldn’t have happened on Bills watch

 

[pfim]

Yet they ignore the 6pts minimum & Forest overspending by double our amount

They are stating that the minimum is 3 points, and the more than that has to do with the size of the breach.

 

[neil999]

Nothing in that to suggest what we will get in 2nd hearing

 

[MikeH72]

If mitigations have already been factored in and have got the sanction reduced to 4, what exactly is going to form the basis of this apparent “appeal”?

 

[Dougie]

The club absolutely must now go to court.

Not or now?

 

[wellillwill]

But wasn't the judgement that we hadn't cooperated overturned as part of the appeal?

Part of the reason we got points back was because we had cooperated.

 

[Strumpet]

So, the Forest commission does not know why we got "three extra points deducted" but assumes "some part" of these is related to "incorrect information" - yet the Everton commission appeal board said we acted in good faith.

Forest are over nearly twice as much as us, and yet we end up with a 33% extra penalty.

And Everton fans are supposed to believe our treatment is not disproportionate and/or corrupt?

On this basis, the interim Everton board - if we even have one - should resign en masse.

Our breach is 19% of the threshold while Forrests is 57%! The Forrest decision is clear that the SIZE of the breach was their primary concern.

 

[BluePaul86]

Hope to feck some one from Everton is fuming as much as i am. That report is a proper kick in the danglers and has to be acted upon. Take legal action against the corrupt helmets ffs Everton. Grow a pair for once in your life.

We'll just let the PL spank our bare bottoms and be 'satisfied ' with it.

 

[hallamblue]

They've really made a rod for their own back with the nonsense they put in these report summaries. We were found not to have misled and therefore got our penalty reduced to 6. Forest are found not to have misled and therefore get a reduction from 6 points to 4 citing Everton who were found to have misled. They could at least read their own stuff.

 

[Melchizedek]

we should just take them to court. No cooperation from this point forward.

We should, but Everton do not have the stones to take on the PL. Everton will take whatever punishment they make up and be happy about it because they want to be seen as "doing the right thing ".

 

[Zatara]

Yes just saw that now , after I posted.

Completely lost for words.

Everton have to bring a separate legal action ( unless they have been given a nod and wink that the 2nd breach will result in a slap on the wrist)

Whats your prediction Jazzy?

 

[nick_waters]

Have there been 3 separate and different panels for the 3 hearings so far? I presume there have been, which makes consistency and fairness just about impossible.

 

[Evertonthat]

They litterally make the rules up as they go along.

Indipendant regulation for the league now!

Nothing about this makes sense... 34.5M breach with clear sporting advantage, and we were given a far more severe punishment, and even after appeal have 50% higher points deduction. What the hell?

 

[steven]

If mitigations have already been factored in and have got the sanction reduced to 4, what exactly is going to form the basis of this apparent “appeal”?

Appeal: Dear Mr Masters, a reminder that we are not everton.
Appeal result: Successful Points fully restored, an addition 30 point deduction for everton for simply existing.

 

[matty1878]

No.

why