what has a new manager or playing bad football got to do with building fitness up? what are you even chatting?
your using pre-season as an excuse for someone to not get fit? mate that's the whole purpose behind it
was he ace against brighton though? he had a good game no better or worse than anyone ( was barely tested lets get that out there )
he's certainly been better last couple of games AND AS I SAID a fully fit functionial coleman benefits us all, but he's been back NEARLY year now and he's hasn't looked the same
lets hope he does get back to his self, but being brutally honest was he that good season before last season before his injury? he hasn't been boss for a couple of years now, he's always remained steady
but as the whole purpose of this topic is who needs to be upgraded and were going on "current form" than it would be coleman
it's like this topic coming out last year and people saying baines ( he was replaced ) and people like you BUT HE WAS BOSS IN 2011 WHEN HE GOT DEM 8 ASSISTS
The manager playing poor football isn't to do with fitness entirely, but it goes some way towards Seamus not exactly excelling in an attacking sense as well. He wasn't told to get forward. He was told to sit back and defend (which ironically has never been his strongest facet).
No, I'm not using pre-season as an excuse at all. I'm saying it was a time when he was getting fit while getting accustomed to a new manager. But if you know anything about football you'll understand that players don't get sharp in pre-season. They get properly sharp/match fit in the first few games of the season proper. Pre-season is there to build up fitness at a base level and build from there (we saw how much this impacted Gylfi for example when he was playing catch up last season).
Yes, he was very good against Brighton. He attacked with a lot more conviction and when needed, defended well.
And yes, he was good in the season before his injury. If you think back, he got injured at the end of Martinez's last season, and only came back around September IIRC in Koeman's first season. Took him a bit of time to pick up that sharpness again, as it would, and then he was playing exceptionally well from December through to his injury.
It has got nothing to do with sentiment. He's just a good player who is far from finished, and you haven't taken any context into account.
He has played 20 games of football in 18 months. That is nothing. There have been injuries in between those games. He now should be fully fit and I think we're seeing that. It's not about keeping the levels up, and those levels have been fine in the last two games.
You're now advocating signing a player who has approximately 15 appearances to his name, and saying you can guarantee he'd be a success. He's not infallible. He looks a good young player but he's made a fair few errors already this season, as all young players do.