Alternatively viewed, we played a weakened side against fellow PL opposition; the opposition was piss poor and had nothing at all to offer as a threat; we decided to give them more ball; the manager decided that despite this he'd make no changes to arrest the decline; we end up with a rB playing right wing with our right winger sat on the bench!
So let's not make out that the manager was doing something daring, bold and innovative. Like his predecessor he tinkered. Like his predecessor he was like a rabbit in headlights when we lost control of the game.
This is just your opinion but you are stating them as a ranty fact.
Maybe our midfield had a bad night and didnt keep possession as well as they normally would. What do you even mean by deciding to give them more of the ball? Was this communicated at the start of the game, or do you think Bobby let a roar out at Gibbo to start faffing about and pass the ball to the Fulham lads?
Maybe Martinez, as manager of the club, decided his changes were worth trying and could get us back in it. To me we had enough possession late on, along with some chances, to have drawn level.
The answer is neither you nor I know. I could understand maybe you feeling certain of something after watching a load of games under us with Martinez but you are just whinging with no basis here and in the match thread.