2025/26 Harrison Armstrong

[MaximusEvertonius]

Problem is he’ll have no role once KDH is back. I don’t know how Moyes would ever start Armstrong. Heck, Harrison might make a great striker.

 

[dannyboy]

Obviously only a small cameo, but he looked better than he did before his loan. I'd start him against Wolves just to mix things up a bit.

 

[Joey66]

Blimey, that loan has done him the world of good!!

Should never have been sent out in the first place !

 

[steve]

Has to start against wolves

 

[Aries]

Lovely footballer.

 

[Zatara]

Well done

 

[witchdoc187]

Should never have been sent out in the first place !

Well, judging by that little cameo I would say it was the right thing and fully justified

 

[MaximusEvertonius]

Again, my biggest question is how Moyes will use him. I can’t see the gaffer figuring out a way to get both KDH and Armstrong on the pitch together. If Armstrong is being developed simply to play backup to KDH, who rarely gets subbed, then sell him or send him back on loan. He’s too good to be wasted on the bench. As I said in another thread, see what happens if you start Armstrong as a striker. Ndiaye on the right, Jack on left, KDH as a 10, and Armstrong up top.

 

[maccavennie]

You'd think he's automatically jumped ahead of Rohl after that short cameo.

 

[Joey66]

Well, judging by that little cameo I would say it was the right thing and fully justified

Why - DM signed Rhol on loan with the obligation to purchase HA looked far better than him?

 

[Swartzy]

Why - DM signed Rhol on loan with the obligation to purchase HA looked far better than him?

Joey, what you saw today was a lad that's had half a season under his belt..
Right move..

 

[Joey66]

Joey, what you saw today was a lad that's had half a season under his belt..
Right move..

No I saw Rhol who will cost us 20 million no need for him with HA - he had rave reviews on loan last season never let's us down a lovely through ball - Rhol gave the 4th goal away utter crao imo !

 

[Swartzy]

No I saw Rhol who will cost us 20 million no need for him with HA - he had rave reviews on loan last season never let's us down a lovely through ball - Rhol gave the 4th goal away utter crao imo !

Yeah, everybody has seen Rohl.
But that doesn't change anything about the loan.

 

[Joey66]

Yeah, everybody has seen Rohl.
But that doesn't change anything about the loan.

Need toloanhim with the obligation to buy where had HA ready showing well in training?
No just help Preston hey ho !

 

[witchdoc187]

Why - DM signed Rhol on loan with the obligation to purchase HA looked far better than him?

Because he now has 1/2 season experience playing football and is a better player for it. Whatever, we agree he looks very promising indeed