Guardian article

[johnnydawg68]

Unlike some on here, I think those stats are relevant. Thanks for posting Billy.

 

[roydo]

Unlike some on here, I think those stats are relevant. Thanks for posting Billy.

They arnt as relevant as P.W.D.L though.

But they are quite interesting.

 

[johnnydawg68]

They arnt as relevant as P.W.D.L though.

But they are quite interesting.

It's ok to discuss why or how teams win and lose, not just that they won or lost though right?

 

[Baines' left foot]

All joking aside it's an impressive stat especially considering we're adapting to a new system.

 

[roydo]

It's ok to discuss why or how teams win and lose, not just that they won or lost though right?

Of course it is mate. Thats why I said they were interesting, but P W D L are the important stats. Thats all.

 

[bluejock]

They might not be relevant to league psition etc... but they still make for interesting reading.

It's when you try to use them in an argument to say your team is doing better than they actually are, that's when you've ventured into Kopite territory.

 

[roydo]

They might not be relevant to league psition etc... but they still make for interesting reading.

It's when you try to use them in an argument to say your team is doing better than they actually are, that's when you've ventured into Kopite territory.

So much this.

 

[steken1]

WE WON DER PASSING

When someone learns to measure how many times strikers lash the centre backs everywhere, we'll win that too.