Group D: Poland, Netherlands, Austria, France

Status
Not open for further replies.
As a former amatuer keeper, I'd expect that to be disallowed. The keeper's dive would have been impeded. They always give those to the defence. Whether he would have saved it is another thing, but the man was clearly in his line of dive. France got away with one, but not unexpectedly.
As a former keeper myself I probably would have Van Dijked him.

Probably why I never made the grade.
 
If the keeper knows he's there, he's not going to dive.

We might not like it but he's definitely interfering/offside.
The ball went past the keeper so fast he didn’t even know the guy was there. Letter of the law it was a correct decision, but in this instance the law’s an ass.
 
It's not even a subjective call though. He's not getting to the ball because somebody is in his eyeline, it's because the ball's in the goal before he can react.

The ball went past the keeper so fast he didn’t even know the guy was there. Letter of the law it was a correct decision, but in this instance the law’s an ass.

Aye

Thing is though, whether he'd make the save or not - the 'keeper is unable to attempt the save because theres a player stood there.

He's not making the save but for all we know he could have anticipated/dived earlier if the player wasn't there.

 
Aye

Thing is though, whether he'd make the save or not - the 'keeper is unable to attempt the save because theres a player stood there.

He's not making the save but for all we know he could have anticipated/dived earlier if the player wasn't there.


That is absolutely not the right application of the rule though. That's not surprising like, think how badly bastardised the handball rule has become.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top