People aren't going to like it, but TFG should be looking at 22/23 if the situation is as desperate. Dyche took us over in game week 22 on 15 pts and kept us up. We're currently on 17 having played 19 game weeks, but going into game week 21.
So what's the point in getting a new crisis manager on a long contract just because people are bored of the face of the current crisis manager?
And another point, if these lads can play football that yields better results than we're currently getting, then why not just go for a non crisis manager and stay up with better football?
Good points. We have and can play some decent football this season, but in extremely isolated periods. Apart from Bournemouth (H) from the off, most of the other attacking play has been when we've fallen behind and had to chase the game.
I think we 'can' play a more advanced attacking game with these players, but largely they're an extremely limited bunch technically, mentally and physically at times, which is where the risk comes in trying to change philosophy half way through the season.
You might also argue that Dyche, as bad as much of it has been, has had us outside the bottom 3 quite comfortably compared to recent seasons (under the circumstances) until now, so why change it now? If everything continues like this, we stay up, just.
However, with this being the last chance to strengthen for this season, who do you strengthen for, current, new or new at the end of the season (especially being short on loan spots currently, they'd have to be outright purchases)? Either way, I expect decisions to be made in the next 3-5 days.
Does anyone know if we've made moves to 'borrow' Dani Olmo yet until he can register for Barca?