Serious question for those of you that haven't read the books, but are following the tv show:
Is there a specific reason why you haven't read the books?
I love reading, and I have over ninety minutes on a train every day commuting so I have a bit of time to indulge. Added to that, George Martin writes in a style which I find to be pretty easy to read. As a result, when the 3rd season ended last year I bought the books and read them from the start. I'll agree that A Feast for Crows (book 4) and A Dance with Dragons are a bit longer than the others, but they aren't hard to read in the way that Tolkein can be, or Thackeray or Chaucer are.
Does anyone feel differently? I can understand why people might not want to read AHEAD of the tv show, but given the amount of people on here who ask for clarification about a character, or an event or a plot line, I get the impression that many haven't read any of the books - I'm curious why that is.
Is there a specific reason why you haven't read the books?
I love reading, and I have over ninety minutes on a train every day commuting so I have a bit of time to indulge. Added to that, George Martin writes in a style which I find to be pretty easy to read. As a result, when the 3rd season ended last year I bought the books and read them from the start. I'll agree that A Feast for Crows (book 4) and A Dance with Dragons are a bit longer than the others, but they aren't hard to read in the way that Tolkein can be, or Thackeray or Chaucer are.
Does anyone feel differently? I can understand why people might not want to read AHEAD of the tv show, but given the amount of people on here who ask for clarification about a character, or an event or a plot line, I get the impression that many haven't read any of the books - I'm curious why that is.