Current Affairs Fox hunting

[ashwuk76]

But Jeremy Corbyn...

Imagine looking at the ghoulish lizard Teresa May and thinking she's what this country needs.

The mind boggles.

Maybe some people just see blue and can't vote for anything red. Maybe it's as simple as that?

 

[neil999]

Here's an interesting one.

You can't write conservatory without "tory".

I put it to YOU that anyone with a nice conservatory is in fact a fox molesting poor basher.

They are also too hot in the summer and too cold in the winter, useless

 

[peteblue]

Because you're massive hypocrites and the party you support endorse barbaric animal cruelty. That's why, Princess. You can't brush it under the carpet. I need you to confront it.

Do you not ride then Chico........

 

[chicoazul]

Do you not ride then Chico........

A nice feisty red head P.

 

[WycombeToffee]

If you don't agree with it maybe don't vote Tory? Just a suggestion.

You would be crazy to vote based on this policy rather than socioeconomic policies. "I don't like hunting, so instead I'll vote in someone who would bankrupt the economy" is hardly good prioritisation. No party will be perfect or fully reflect your views.

 

[neil999]

You would be crazy to vote based on this policy rather than socioeconomic policies. "I don't like hunting, so instead I'll vote in someone who would bankrupt the economy" is hardly good prioritisation. No party will be perfect or fully reflect your views.

Have you met the public?

 

[Sapie88]

You would be crazy to vote based on this policy rather than socioeconomic policies. "I don't like hunting, so instead I'll vote in someone who would bankrupt the economy" is hardly good prioritisation. No party will be perfect or fully reflect your views.

Yet you're voting for a party that has seen debt increase by over £750bn and has failed on every target they set out to achieve?

 

[COYBL25]

They are also too hot in the summer and too cold in the winter, useless

Good for growing tomatoes in though Neil x

 

[JimmyJeffers]

You would be crazy to vote based on this policy rather than socioeconomic policies. "I don't like hunting, so instead I'll vote in someone who would bankrupt the economy" is hardly good prioritisation. No party will be perfect or fully reflect your views.

'Hmmm I'm not sure who to vote for. Oh this party endorses barbaric acts of animal cruelty, I'm not sure about that. Oh look though, they also want to take more money from poor people. Excellent. They get my vote'

 

[COYBL25]

They are also too hot in the summer and too cold in the winter, useless

Also if you put the kettle on and an iron they can be used as a sauna in the Summer too x

 

[WycombeToffee]

Yet you're voting for a party that has seen debt increase by over £750bn and has failed on every target they set out to achieve?

I must have been through this about 10 times now. The debt argument is just ridiculous. It isn't even an argument. How can people not understand the difference between debt and deficit? It would have been impossible to reduce the debt straight away. But the deficit is almost cancelled, and we'll soon be in an annual surplus, ensuring the debt can start coming down. If you're so concerned about the debt, why support someone who would hugely increase it (and the deficit)?

 

[WycombeToffee]

'Hmmm I'm not sure who to vote for. Oh this party endorses barbaric acts of animal cruelty, I'm not sure about that. Oh look though, they also want to take more money from poor people. Excellent. They get my vote'

They don't want to take more money from poor people. They've actually done the exact opposite by increasing the personal allowance by £4000. Income inequality is at a 31 year low.

 

[Sapie88]

I must have been through this about 10 times now. The debt argument is just ridiculous. It isn't even an argument. How can people not understand the difference between debt and deficit? It would have been impossible to reduce the debt straight away. But the deficit is almost cancelled, and we'll soon be in an annual surplus, ensuring the debt can start coming down. If you're so concerned about the debt, why support someone who would hugely increase it (and the deficit)?

View attachment 36754

How will they though? They haven't even fully released the figures yet, Barry Gardiner has made it very clear that when they do they have been over everything.

I'm not buying anything the Tories say when 30 or so of them can't even declare things correctly.

 

[ashwuk76]

They don't want to take more money from poor people. They've actually done the exact opposite by increasing the personal allowance by £4000. Income inequality is at a 31 year low.

Are you for real? They have taken away from the most vulnerable in society in the elderly and disabled and given that money as tax breaks to the rich!

 

[peteblue]

I must have been through this about 10 times now. The debt argument is just ridiculous. It isn't even an argument. How can people not understand the difference between debt and deficit? It would have been impossible to reduce the debt straight away. But the deficit is almost cancelled, and we'll soon be in an annual surplus, ensuring the debt can start coming down. If you're so concerned about the debt, why support someone who would hugely increase it (and the deficit)?

View attachment 36754

Yeah, but worrabout dem red coats......

 

[Sapie88]

Are you for real? They have taken away from the most vulnerable in society in the elderly and disabled and given that money as tax breaks to the rich!

Those poor rich people.