Is right - but I don't mind so much the, with all due respect, no marks, some of them had a good go and put up good performances. The thing that gets me is FIFA then bring in no mark Reffs from these no mark countries.The Argies don't look like they'll be in Russia*, and maybe not Italy either. If you lose, you lose, but I'm not placated by the Uzbeks' chance to qualify. I want to see the best teams in the world, not a uniform distribution of football playing nations from across the world.
*Oh, looks like they can still qualify by beating NZ, so maybe not all is lost yet.
LOL we get the same number of spots as South America. We run this sport.
4 rubbish countries from Asia - or more - getting a bite of the FIFA cake. (after SK, Japan, Iran and Australia)
Isn't that the Club World Cup or the UEFA Champions League?The Argies don't look like they'll be in Russia*, and maybe not Italy either. If you lose, you lose, but I'm not placated by the Uzbeks' chance to qualify. I want to see the best teams in the world, not a uniform distribution of football playing nations from across the world.
*Oh, looks like they can still qualify by beating NZ, so maybe not all is lost yet.
Isn't that the Club World Cup or the UEFA Champions League?
Or do we still pretend that national sides are better than club sides? I see you're argument, but I'm going to agree with @Mikey_Fitzgerald here - the World Cup isn't about quality football, it's about seeing all of the national cultures come together in a generally agreeable celebratory fashion. It's supposed to be a big world party with some football thrown on the end.
The best team in the world is almost certainly one of Real Madrid, Juventus, Barcelona, or Bayern Munich any given year. They would utterly butcher any national team.
I think they will expand the tournament to 64 teams eventually. I love the World Cup and the longer the tournament (2 -3 months?), the better.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.