Ferguson

Status
Not open for further replies.
4) Do I think Darren Wilson got up that morning itching to kill some black kid? No, of course not. But I will tell you this. In this country, every single person, black or white, is taught/conditioned to believe that young, black men are dangerous. If you worked a job like Darren Wilson, where you were conditioned to believe that young black men weren't human, they were potential threats to your life, you'd have a warped sense of reality. And that goes for cops everywhere. I've known plenty of cops in my life. This idea that they're all fair minded civic heroes is laughable. I don't know Darren Wilson, and to be honest I feel sorry for him. I think he lost his mind momentarily and now a kid is dead, and his life is potentially ruined. The defense of Darren Wilson has already started, but to me he's toast. He's going to jail. And I don't want to think about what will happen to him there.

5) The fact that Michael Brown was involved in a robbery (not armed) that morning is irrelevant. The punishment for suspected theft of cigars is not execution in the streets. If it is now, I'm getting the fuk out of here.

.



If the facts bear out that Michael Brown did what he did (charged an officer with intent to do harm after being told to freeze) then Officer Wilson isn't going to jail. He has every right to defend himself.

Furthermore, how are Michael Brown's actions in the robbery not relevant? For me, they're completely relevant. I'm quite confident that I can say that Michael Brown was not shot because he stole cigars. He was shot because he made an incredibly poor decision (assaulting a peace officer) and paid for it with his life.
 

I'm saying they are idiots for being out inflaming the situation. What on earth good do they think they can achieve?

That they don't know any facts makes it worse. Their poster talks of praying for peace. Last time I looked most folk prayed quietly in private. Unless that is their religion is a sham cover for their pre-historic views.

I'd be equally against any group of black folk that were out protesting on the other side of this issue. The fact I don't like your stereotypical white, fat American Christian is entirely another matter.

Are you ok with white skinny American Christians?
 
Any situation. The subsequent internal police investigations are there to rubber-stamp all killings. In fact, cops in America can even kill a handcuffed unarmed man lol

http://newsone.com/2953674/victor-white-iii-killed-in-handcuffs/
https://news.vice.com/article/el-pa...cop-executing-handcuffed-man-wheres-the-anger

God Bless America :D
I love how you guys come on here and just group all cops in America as bad people who shoot and kill individuals constantly. There are incidents, yes, and some are due to a dirty cop or one who made a bad decision. America isn't some place where people get gunned down each day by police for no reason. We don't search for articles that paint England as some horrible country.
 
I love how you guys come on here and just group all cops in America as bad people who shoot and kill individuals constantly.
...except I didn't do that lol

We don't search for articles that paint England as some horrible country.
I don't think you'd go very far searching for articles on the Met Police gunning handcuffed people down, or even shooting anyone who "assaults" them. Sometimes I do wish they did exactly that with the knife-wielding gangsters in London who stab people to death in broad daylight because they know the Met Police wouldn't as much as spit at them. Police here in the UK are too cowardly for me and in the US they're too bloodthirsty.
 

I despise the hypocrisy of all bible thumpers irrespective of the colour of their skin.

I can't make this any simpler for you. They are deliberately setting out to inflame a tense situation without knowing the full set of facts. For that reason they are pure idiots. The fact they are fat is, I admit, irrelevant. It just so happens that most of those bible belt white rednecks all seem to be obese.

Your use of the phrase "the blacks" is not really acceptable in modern society. You wouldn't use that phrase at work so why think it is acceptable here?

The disadvantaged kids currently rioting have issues. They need to be properly understood before you start castigating them as lifelong criminals. The interweb tells me the inner-city education rates for non-whites in the subject state are horrific. By comparison Bobby Joe and Belinda probably had a half-decent educational start in life but persist in eating themselves into oblivion whilst spouting misguided claims and protestations from a book written two thousand years ago.

1) We don't despise you.

2) We aren't all white.

3) We aren't all rednecks.

4) We aren't all obese.
 
Exactly. Communism rules. At least until you grow up a bit, get into the real world and see how there will always be a good proportion of society that's selfish, lazy and dishonest so cocks it up for the rest.

In theory though it rocks. Everyone's equal. What's not to like. My proudest days were spent in the student labour party!

Can't believe any kid/student wouldn't go for it in theory at that age. On the other side of the coin a far-right/Tory ideology is surely something that should only ever get ingrained after a lifetime of hard knocks and unfortunate grim reality.

How any kids/students could ever be Tories is beyond me. They'd have to be a right shower of (language)

article-2407406-1B8A4305000005DC-25_634x489.jpg

The operative words being "in theory."
 
Insulting people about being left wing on a forum where the majority of people come from a left wing area is going to rub people the wrong way.

Funny.

Doesn't stop the left winger from insulting those on the right does it? What about rubbing those on the right "the wrong way?"

You think we should do something about that?
 
No.

That's semantics. And if you don't understand that people are not objecting to the word black, then there is no help for you. It's not the wording of your posts that makes your statements racist. It's the content.

So, let's call this for what it is and answer his question. If you don't recall, his request was show the whites that are rioting in Ferguson MO.

Let me save you the trouble. You can't. So when he says that the "blacks" are rioting in Ferguson MO., he's making a factual assertion. One that many on here either don't want to see or worse, willfully refuse to see it.
 
Last edited:
And when was this mate? 1963 right? What was he supposed to do in that era, invent a word and call them by that in the hope it took off?

A label has to exist when speaking of the subject matter of race, but it has to be a mutually agreed one. We can talk of blacks and whites in the context of Ferguson, as you simply have to, and King had to use a label in that context too.

But do you know in an ordinary situation if I were trying to define a black person to a friend, you know what I'd call him? John. Or Afro-Carribean. Or British. Or that lad over there. Using the skin colour as an adjective to solely define someone disregards all other identifiers and characteristics of that person.

Fixed your post.
 

The NAACP seem to think it acceptable, and how else would you define a group of people comprising one race?

Ouch. Nailed on mate.

By the way, imagine trying to start up a white, raced based equivalent of the NAACP or LULAC.
 
Totally. The fact that skin colour is still used to classify people into groups is horrible to me. It should be "people protesting" not "blacks protesting".

The same why that the "black man" was shot by the "white peace officer?"

People only want to use context when it serves/suits their purposes. Our media is notorious for doing this.

Remember that.
 
Because social context and human history dictates that it's bound to be a difference, and that won't change. We're actually NOT the same - black culture and white culture over generations is markedly different - the only way that changes is if we share the same culture for an extended period of time to the point where similarities vastly out-proportion difference.

It's the same reason for clashes between the Middle East and the West, for China and Japan etc. etc. Globalisation hasn't occurred to the point where shared experience outweights cultural difference and, to be honest, that's a good thing, as diversity is the spice of life.

Blacks and whites will never be equal, and striving for that is a fallacy. What we should be striving for is not to become the same, but to open up identical opportunity in life for both.

I agree with your statement above.

Just don't let the "inequality is wrong/equality is a right" gang latch on to your last statement there. They'll have a field day with it.
 
...except I didn't do that lol


I don't think you'd go very far searching for articles on the Met Police gunning handcuffed people down, or even shooting anyone who "assaults" them. Sometimes I do wish they did exactly that with the knife-wielding gangsters in London who stab people to death in broad daylight because they know the Met Police wouldn't as much as spit at them. Police here in the UK are too cowardly for me and in the US they're too bloodthirsty.

There you go grouping officers in the US. They are all blood thirsty. Awesome.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top