Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 105 7.7%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,259 92.3%

  • Total voters
    1,364
For at least the last three or four years, the accounts have been published pretty much some time in the last few weeks of December. They're expected to be published by the end of this year ( though I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them published tomorrow ), so they're not delayed at all.

Maybe the question you should be asking yourself is why you're talking utter wham on the internet ?

It really depresses me how easily our fans our lead.

Our accounts are delayed.

From companies house. We applied to move our accounting reference date back a month.

efc.png
 
FFP is based on a three year rolling period.

And if Esk is to be believed, I know he gets a bad press, but the money side ive always considered him to be on the nail, but he suggests that we are very close to the limits as is.

I myself and I am defo not somebody whos word means much, but looking closely at our current financial position, we would need some major cash injection in the form of vastly increased commercial deals to have any chance of wild spurges.

Our problems are we have LOTS of players on high wages who are either not good enough nor not good enough to sell, plus very poor commercial deals compared to teams we aspire to compete with.

Now Ancelotti will gives us a little bump, Zlatan, if it happens, also, but despite their global appeal, they wont be making a dent.

I mean this isnt me being doom and gloom, if we have promised Carlo dough to spend, will be give him it, just very interested to see how we do it.
 

No the mask slipped when our billionaires failed to fund a Stadium.

City's owners bought the Stadium out the Stadium. Extended it and then spent built a complex that included a casino and a Stadium for the youth team with a 21,000 capacity. We are being conned.

Mate, you've just recanted the line about the club pushing the city for a loan when – as it's been repeated a million times – that isn't the case.

Very strange. What was your previous username?
 
No the mask slipped when our billionaires failed to fund a Stadium.

City's owners bought the Stadium out the Stadium. Extended it and then spent built a complex that included a casino and a Stadium for the youth team with a 21,000 capacity. We are being conned.

City do not own The Etihad, they pay rent of 2m a year.

The Council also paid a lot towards the refit to a football stadium.
 
City do not own The Etihad, they pay rent of 2m a year.

The Council also paid a lot towards the refit to a football stadium.

You are talking semantics.

The original agreement was for City to share the cost of the Stadium but for City to pay a premium on any capacities above Maine Road. That changed in 2010 when City promised a £1bn investment and a larger capacity in exchange for £2m in rent. Since them they have expanded the Etihad but still only pay £50k a week.
 

Mate, you've just recanted the line about the club pushing the city for a loan when – as it's been repeated a million times – that isn't the case.

Very strange. What was your previous username?

If the Mayor was falsely claiming that the Club was asking for a loan then I look forward to the club putting the Mayor straight.

What is your current username hoodwinked.
 
How has it been professional. We are owned by a billionaire who is supposedly the front man for one of the richest men on the planet. Yet we were asking a skint city council to procure us a loan.

Shouldn't needto be a repeated question but on what planet does a billionaire use his own money to fund a £4-500m stadium? Pretty sure Levy didn't solely fund the building of Tottenham Stadium, the previous ownership at Arsenal didn't self fund the building of the Emirates either
 
Mistakes have been made but now moshiri has finally got what he wanted all along brands as dof who was first choice and now a top manager who can set the team up. It will take time but things are finally looking better
 
You are talking semantics.

The original agreement was for City to share the cost of the Stadium but for City to pay a premium on any capacities above Maine Road. That changed in 2010 when City promised a £1bn investment and a larger capacity in exchange for £2m in rent. Since them they have expanded the Etihad but still only pay £50k a week.

Pfft, semantics. You're wholly wrong and trying to play it off as a word game.
 

Top