So whats the option then? We are stuck with the current board forever? Because in your world its not possible for anybody to buy the Club.
Of course it's possible in "my world". It's just not possible in my world for it to be entirely down to Kenwright that they haven't. Reread the post.
In my world, however, it isn't likely for a buyer to obtain 100% of the shares, which might affect the position of potential investors. That's because my world has the Companies Acts. Your world may vary.
There are buyers out there. Maybe the current owners dont wish to sell? Maybe they are asking for too much money?
Owners...plural? Is that an implicit agreement that it's not all down to Bill?
For the record, I believe that some prospective owners wouldn't demand 100% (though the fact that they could only have 80% does make us less attractive to investors - I think it makes no difference to Abromovich style benefactors). But equally, I believe that these potential investors could easily just buy Woods, Earl and Grantchester's shares.
In fact, a lot of football takeovers happen this way. Off the top of my head, United, Sunderland and Arsenal have had shareholders who slowly increased the size of their shareholdings by buying from one shareholder at a time. Somebody could do that at Everton, but nobody has. In fact, you never even hear stories that somebody has tried to buy from any of the major shareholders.
He has saddled the Club with huge debts.
Don't Everton have the 5th lowest debt in the league - and 3 of the teams with lower debt are newly promoted?
And the fact is that all most new owners do is borrow tons of money and saddle it on the club.
He is the figure head. Whether he owns 1% or 3000% shares, he IS the chairman. So surely the shabby way the club has been run is down to him?
If you think the club has been run shabbily. I don't, actually. I think a money injection would help a lot, but if your big issue with Kenwright is that he hasn't sold up, that's got nothing to do with his Chairmanship.
That's not to say I don't wish he would shut up. You might also have a problem with Kirkby, which is another matter. But this thread is about whether Kenwright will sell up.
Nothing anybody will say will change that.
Yes we've noticed that. You defend you position with "facts" (like the 100% ownership), and when it is pointed out that you are factually wrong your position doesn't move one inch. Soon, in another thread, you'll be saying that Kenwright is blocking a sale.








