Everton change bridging loan from Barclays to company in BVI

[Hibbert&Ernie]

This was happening when he was a shareholder if I remember right.

He said he pulled his shares last year in protest because of how it was being ran

Such was his right. All about choice. 'Be good, Get good, Give up'. Too many owners too little cash. Still, enough for a plane and the airing of dirty laundry.

 

[TX Bill]

No, clearly no case.

Lol!

Always is in your mind.

Clearly.

 

[TX Bill]

Cmon Dave.

Come up with some real hard hitting evidence that shows we're being robbed blind.

Come up with the goods Dave. You can do it. I know you've got it in you.

 

[Neiler]

Cmon Dave.

Come up with some real hard hitting evidence that shows we're being robbed blind.

Come up with the goods Dave. You can do it. I know you've got it in you.

Fair point there isnt any evidance that what Dave is saying is anything but made up Jarg tbf.

 

[davek]

Cmon Dave.

Come up with some real hard hitting evidence that shows we're being robbed blind.

Come up with the goods Dave. You can do it. I know you've got it in you.

Bill, if you remember we had dialogue in the Kewnright board thread and then you closed it down because you were adamant I had no evidence of serious bids for the club - evidence most people would accept as being strong. Is it really worth debating again in this thread?

 

[davek]

Fair point there isnt any evidance that what Dave is saying is anything but made up Jarg tbf.

I thought we had an undersatnding on this point ealier in the thread over this? Well done. Lol!

 

[Neiler]

I thought we had an undersatnding on this point ealier in the thread over this? Well done. Lol!

Still do mate, i agree if this is true - i will be the first to say board out - the problem is i dont think its true - in fact i think your guessing and you cant prove it or more likely made it up.

If its true mate, ill give you a massive apology - i think im safe enough though and your reaching.

 

[TX Bill]

Bill, if you remember we had dialogue in the Kewnright board thread and then you closed it down because you were adamant I had no evidence of serious bids for the club - evidence most people would accept as being strong. Is it really worth debating again in this thread?

Davek

You never came up with any evidence of legit bids. Not only was I adamant that you provide it, you refused to do so. I was 100% right, you were unfortunately, 100% wrong.

Now.

I'm gonna warn you now in public. If you want to continue along that smart ass type response, you'll find yourself on the outside looking in.

Are we clear?

 

[TX Bill]

Still do mate, i agree if this is true - i will be the first to say board out - the problem is i dont think its true - in fact i think your guessing and you cant prove it or more likely made it up.

If its true mate, ill give you a massive apology - i think im safe enough though and your reaching.

He was guessing/fabricating on his "evidence" that Kenwright has turned down serious bids since he couldn't come up with the goods. No reason why this should be any different.

It's like everything with him, he spins whatever he can to suit his narrative. Doesn't matter if it isn't true.

 

[davek]

Davek

You never came up with any evidence of legit bids. Not only was I adamant that you provide it, you refused to do so. I was 100% right, you were unfortunately, 100% wrong.

Now.

I'm gonna warn you now in public. If you want to continue along that smart ass type response, you'll find yourself on the outside looking in.

Are we clear?

Smart arse response? How do you mean?

 

[Chang Elephant]

Davek

You never came up with any evidence of legit bids. Not only was I adamant that you provide it, you refused to do so. I was 100% right, you were unfortunately, 100% wrong.

Now.

I'm gonna warn you now in public. If you want to continue along that smart ass type response, you'll find yourself on the outside looking in.

Are we clear?

Your definition of legitimate was a touch vague/undercooked if I remember rightly. I was hoping you'd expand on that but the thread was closed.

 

[TX Bill]

Your definition of legitimate was a touch vague/undercooked if I remember rightly. I was hoping you'd expand on that but the thread was closed.

It was rather actually rather easy and since I put reading comprehension as one of your strong suits as well as his, I didn't think it would be very hard for you to understand what I was asking him to provide.

He failed. Miserably.

Conversation over.

 

[Chang Elephant]

Cheers Bill, you're comprehension skills are also reasonable for a Texan.

 

[TX Bill]

Cheers Bill, you're comprehension skills are also reasonable for a Texan.

We Texans are stupid like.

 

[chicoazul]

Cheers Bill, you're comprehension skills are also reasonable for a Texan.

He'll shoot you lid and I'm not kidding ffs.