It's bad enough as it is, long stoppages approaching 5 minutes. How much longer is it going to be when first the man in his VAR office takes several minutes to decide whether he goes with the ref's call or not and then the ref takes a few more if called upon to make the final decision. And after all that we'd still get a decision that half the punters would say is incorrect!
Let's just call VAR for what it is -- a failed initiative that no amount of pitchside deliberation will improve and which should be scrapped immediately.
I understand exactly what you mean, but the ref is the man in charge and I feel the final word should be his, not a VAR operator. The ref could easily be told that there is a possible error in a decision he's made and should check the monitor. Then both the VAR operator and the ref could be looking at the same incident at the same time whilst discussing it. It's just a thought and I don't have the answer, just an opinion. As I said, I feel it needs a rethink in the way it's used.
My opinion is based on the Premier League continuing to use VAR. If they were to get rid altogether, that wouldn't bother me in the slightest.