That was the Digne one? That was never given in the first place was it?Should actually be 6-1 on bottom stat. City had one disallowed against us for an offside. A clear enough offside though it was.
Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That was the Digne one? That was never given in the first place was it?Should actually be 6-1 on bottom stat. City had one disallowed against us for an offside. A clear enough offside though it was.
Serious question- will they vote to scrap VAR in the summer or will it just be the rules themselves that will be looked at?
Even Liverpool fans think it’s a joke of a decisionNot sure what you’re laughing because you’re literally the only person in the entire world who thinks you’re right (there’s literally an official explanation proving you wrong). But then I’ve read some of your other posts so you’re probably used to that.
De gea dived the other way and had 0 chance of re-diving to save the shot. So didn’t interfere that way. Also didn’t interfere because de gea saw the shot clearly enough to dive the correct way and if there were no deflection he would have saved it. So again. Didn’t interfere with playHe moved his feet was he was then in play so interfering.
The natural movement of the ball was going in the net. And it went in the net. Without touching him. De gea flapped the opposite direction. The game was not changed by him being thereIt's an absolute technicality - but he did change the natural movement of the ball, it would've hit him if he hadn't moved (technically "dummying" it) but also if he wasnt there it's a goal.
The bad part is that this is so polarising. No rule should have this sort of argument.
Basically, get up off your backside when you go down and that won't happen...and it wasnt a foul because the phase of play continued to a shot so advantage was technically played.
So when a player fouls another player to give away a pentalty, but the attacking player is offside, what is given? A penalty. So this is incorrect.He moved his feet was he was then in play so interfering.
Why is Siggy sat there though the tit, if he makes an effort to get up out the way the goal would have stood.
He's not blocking De gea's line of sight to the ball though, De gea can see all of the ball and DCL, he moves the right way for where the shot is going.
Someone put this on Twitter, and it was even better because the thumbnail didn’t even have the pillow inWhat happened in the Everton game today? missed it as there was a cushion on the floor in front of me, blocking the tv
What.So when a player fouls another player to give away a pentalty, but the attacking player is offside, what is given? A penalty. So this is incorrect.
If he gets up he's in de geas sight line!Why is Siggy sat there though the tit, if he makes an effort to get up out the way the goal would have stood.
He's not blocking De gea's line of sight to the ball though, De gea can see all of the ball and DCL, he moves the right way for where the shot is going.