Once cuco comes in we can turn our attention to the bigger names like Gestede, Rooney, Jakupovic, Michael Dawson and Whabi Khazri
Once cuco comes in we can turn our attention to the bigger names like Gestede, Rooney, Jakupovic, Michael Dawson and Whabi Khazri
Well if BK said he'd promised transfer funds, it must be true. Hope its ring fenced.BK, when at the Dixies, said Mosh had promised transfer funds. I'm open to see some real evidence of a substantial net budget but the 60m claimed by Mosh himself to have been bid last summer wasn't subsequently spent.
I was going to wait until after the window closed to post here but tonight seems the right time. My theory of the warchest being clever marketing is looking pretty solid unfortunately. I was certainly wrong about the order in which things would happen but I didn't count on that clever Chinese facility enabling us the spend the Lukaku money before it arrived.
Overall I think the window's been pretty good and we'll very likely sign Sigy and a couple of others while selling Barks etc leaving us with a net spend that's positive but nothing suggestive of having a sugar daddy owner because we clearly don't have one. We have a clever investor who's facilitated our rise in fortune and may well deliver a new stadium though he certainly won't pay for it anymore than he'll pay for Sigy.
City and Chelsea saw massive net investment initially to bridge the gap so how far our more modest model can take us remains to be seen. Walsh will have to perform highly and if he does and we get some luck who knows in the long term?
In the short term I predict RK, after a difficult early part of the campaign, will deliver on his usual reliable league performance and see us finish 6-8 at the end of the 17/18 season and 5-8 the season after before leaving.
I think it the right time given the manager's publicly expressed dose of realism regarding the spending thus far. My point was that the warchest was more marketing than reality and RK echoed that by pointing out despite the media proclaiming Everton's spending power we've actually spent very little net thus far.Why is it the right time though? It all looked good while Lukaku was still here as we had a massive net spend and now we've sold him and not brought anyone in, it doesn't look good.
If at the end of the window we are in a similar position to now then your post will be valid and well predicted in my opinion. However, if we sign Sigurdsson for £45m, say buy someone else for £25m, sell Barkley for £25m. Your OP said:
Our official net spend for summer 2016 was -£1.19m.
Our official net spend for January 2017 was £19.4m.
So if my scenario happens we would have had a net spend in his time here of close to £65m. I'd be pretty happy with that in 'net spend' terms, but it'd still be a side issue because we probably wouldn't have replaced our 25 goal a season a striker which is way more important for me than judging us on net spend.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.