Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Research collaborations between the UK and the rest of the EU have been on the rise for the past four years, new data shows.

On average, cross-Channel partnerships were producing 26 per cent more high-quality research in 2015 than in 2012, with the average collaboration score, as calculated by the Nature Index 2016, increasing from 120 to 152.

In contrast, the score for UK collaborations with the rest of the world has remained between 40 and 50 since 2012.

The Nature Index spotlights some of the most fruitful partnerships between countries or institutions by measuring each partner’s presence in 68 journals.

Compromised by Brexit

The Nature Index says the increase in partnerships, “Mostly boils down to money, free movement and broad collaborations,” all of which would be compromised when the UK leaves the EU and cuts itself out of its funding schemes.

With UK research collaboration increasingly focused on Europe, David Swinbanks of the Nature Index said, “It is not surprising that any uncertainty linked to Brexit is giving cause for concern.”

Researchers have been awaiting details of the country’s plans for leaving the EU, and this new data could strengthen the argument for a soft Brexit, which would allow the UK to retain access to EU research grants.

The Nature research shows 700 UK institutions had collaborations with institutions elsewhere in the EU in 2015, up from 651 in 2012.

Overall, the UK’s strongest ties were with Germany, followed by France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands.

The universities of Cambridge and Oxford were the UK’s most enthusiastic collaborators with other EU countries, accounting for 48 of the 100 most productive partnerships.

The French National Centre for Scientific Research has the highest overall average collaboration score, followed by Italy’s National Institute for Astrophysics, CERN, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Max Planck Institute.

https://www.natureindex.com/
 
The government must improve the support it offers to resettled refugees trying to find a job in Britain, according to a group of resettlement experts from the University of Sussex.

In the first longitudinal study of its kind, academics, who researched the experiences of 280 refugees who resettled in Britain as part of the Government's Gateway Protection Programme five years ago, claim the system needs to provide better fast-track learning opportunities and mentoring schemes to help resettled refugees to find work.

The three-year research programme, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), involved refugees from Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia and Iraq who were resettled in Brighton and Hove, Norwich, Manchester and Sheffield.

The University of Sussex experts found that the current system does not meet the diversity of refugees coming to resettle in Britain—as a result they are calling for the following changes to be made to the system:

  • Refugees with higher levels of education need fast-track learning routes which support them in finding employment which reflects their previous work and qualifications.
  • Overseas qualifications are often not recognised in the UK - pathways through the education system such as vocational training and ways of 'topping up' qualifications need to be put in place to support people.
  • If you don't have UK qualifications or UK work experience it is very difficult to convince an employer to hire you—research highlights the need for buddying schemes, work shadowing and mentoring to prove you can do a job.
The government's Gateway Protection Programme resettles up to 750 refugees a year in small groups (between 60 – 100 people) based on nationality. Last year the former Prime Minister David Cameron pledged to resettle 20,000 Syrian refugees by 2020 – the academics are now calling on the current Prime Minister Theresa May to ensure the system reflects the diversity of refugees in order for them to have optimum chance to reach their full potential.

Dr Linda Morrice, who worked on the research project, said: "Refugees who are starting a new life in Britain want to work and see this as a key pathway to integrating. This government needs to improve the current resettlement system in order to ensure refugees resettling in Britain now, like those from Syria, have the best opportunity and support to gain employment which meet their skills.

"We must shift the focus from talking about 'meeting numbers and targets' to ensuring that we have fast-track learning routes in place, especially English language learning. For people with higher-level qualifications we need tailored support to help refugees to gain qualifications and find work."

Yared, a former high court judge in Ethiopia, who resettled in the UK 10 years ago as part of the government's scheme, struggled to get a job when he arrived and is a now a traffic warden in Brighton. He dreams of being a human rights lawyer but works as a traffic warden because, he says: "Without a job you are living as a beggar."

http://www.sussex.ac.uk/migration/research/integrationcitizenship/refugeeresettlement
 
I keep seeing the words 'funded by the EU' as if this was free money....it isn't, it is redistributed money....we are more than capable of distributing our own money amongst our own scientists while still collaborating with people we and they wish to......

I think I'm right in saying that we receive more in H2020 funding than we contribute. Around £1.5bn more if memory serves. It's something the government have pledged to continue funding.
 
The government must improve the support it offers to resettled refugees trying to find a job in Britain, according to a group of resettlement experts from the University of Sussex.

In the first longitudinal study of its kind, academics, who researched the experiences of 280 refugees who resettled in Britain as part of the Government's Gateway Protection Programme five years ago, claim the system needs to provide better fast-track learning opportunities and mentoring schemes to help resettled refugees to find work.

The three-year research programme, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), involved refugees from Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia and Iraq who were resettled in Brighton and Hove, Norwich, Manchester and Sheffield.

The University of Sussex experts found that the current system does not meet the diversity of refugees coming to resettle in Britain—as a result they are calling for the following changes to be made to the system:

  • Refugees with higher levels of education need fast-track learning routes which support them in finding employment which reflects their previous work and qualifications.
  • Overseas qualifications are often not recognised in the UK - pathways through the education system such as vocational training and ways of 'topping up' qualifications need to be put in place to support people.
  • If you don't have UK qualifications or UK work experience it is very difficult to convince an employer to hire you—research highlights the need for buddying schemes, work shadowing and mentoring to prove you can do a job.
The government's Gateway Protection Programme resettles up to 750 refugees a year in small groups (between 60 – 100 people) based on nationality. Last year the former Prime Minister David Cameron pledged to resettle 20,000 Syrian refugees by 2020 – the academics are now calling on the current Prime Minister Theresa May to ensure the system reflects the diversity of refugees in order for them to have optimum chance to reach their full potential.

Dr Linda Morrice, who worked on the research project, said: "Refugees who are starting a new life in Britain want to work and see this as a key pathway to integrating. This government needs to improve the current resettlement system in order to ensure refugees resettling in Britain now, like those from Syria, have the best opportunity and support to gain employment which meet their skills.

"We must shift the focus from talking about 'meeting numbers and targets' to ensuring that we have fast-track learning routes in place, especially English language learning. For people with higher-level qualifications we need tailored support to help refugees to gain qualifications and find work."

Yared, a former high court judge in Ethiopia, who resettled in the UK 10 years ago as part of the government's scheme, struggled to get a job when he arrived and is a now a traffic warden in Brighton. He dreams of being a human rights lawyer but works as a traffic warden because, he says: "Without a job you are living as a beggar."

http://www.sussex.ac.uk/migration/research/integrationcitizenship/refugeeresettlement


Typical, expect to walk into a job, be given a house and in that last para so he dreams of being a HR lawyer - = gravy train. My advice to the likes of these is stay in your own country and make that better.
 
I think I'm right in saying that we receive more in H2020 funding than we contribute. Around £1.5bn more if memory serves. It's something the government have pledged to continue funding.

And I'm sure we will. Investing in science and technology always gives a payback. If anything this may well add to the science pool that has been diminished by centralising everything........
 
I think I'm right in saying that we receive more in H2020 funding than we contribute. Around £1.5bn more if memory serves. It's something the government have pledged to continue funding.


Overall we pay more in than we get out. Stop and think it is all those new countries with their hands out for money rather than paying in. When will the likes of them be positive contributors? Look at those countries who are hopeful of getting in - Ukraine, Bosnia, Albania, Serbia for example.
 
Research collaborations between the UK and the rest of the EU have been on the rise for the past four years, new data shows.

On average, cross-Channel partnerships were producing 26 per cent more high-quality research in 2015 than in 2012, with the average collaboration score, as calculated by the Nature Index 2016, increasing from 120 to 152.

In contrast, the score for UK collaborations with the rest of the world has remained between 40 and 50 since 2012.

The Nature Index spotlights some of the most fruitful partnerships between countries or institutions by measuring each partner’s presence in 68 journals.

Compromised by Brexit

The Nature Index says the increase in partnerships, “Mostly boils down to money, free movement and broad collaborations,” all of which would be compromised when the UK leaves the EU and cuts itself out of its funding schemes.

With UK research collaboration increasingly focused on Europe, David Swinbanks of the Nature Index said, “It is not surprising that any uncertainty linked to Brexit is giving cause for concern.”

Researchers have been awaiting details of the country’s plans for leaving the EU, and this new data could strengthen the argument for a soft Brexit, which would allow the UK to retain access to EU research grants.

The Nature research shows 700 UK institutions had collaborations with institutions elsewhere in the EU in 2015, up from 651 in 2012.

Overall, the UK’s strongest ties were with Germany, followed by France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands.

The universities of Cambridge and Oxford were the UK’s most enthusiastic collaborators with other EU countries, accounting for 48 of the 100 most productive partnerships.

The French National Centre for Scientific Research has the highest overall average collaboration score, followed by Italy’s National Institute for Astrophysics, CERN, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Max Planck Institute.

https://www.natureindex.com/


For me this is beside the point. The reason for me to leave is to get out from under Brussels that is it, end of.
 
Typical, expect to walk into a job, be given a house and in that last para so he dreams of being a HR lawyer - = gravy train. My advice to the likes of these is stay in your own country and make that better.

He was a high court lawyer? So it's fair to say a very smart cookie, and certainly over-qualified to be a street cleaner. To say he's here for some kind of gravy train is a strange thing to say.
 
Typical, expect to walk into a job, be given a house and in that last para so he dreams of being a HR lawyer - = gravy train. My advice to the likes of these is stay in your own country and make that better.

ref·u·gee
ˌrefyo͝oˈjē/
noun
noun: refugee; plural noun: refugees
a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.

http://observers.france24.com/en/20161004-oromo-eyewitness-violence-ethiopia-bishoftu

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/10/world/africa/ethiopia-state-of-emergency.html
 
He was a high court lawyer? So it's fair to say a very smart cookie, and certainly over-qualified to be a street cleaner. To say he's here for some kind of gravy train is a strange thing to say.

We are I am quite sure well covered in that profession, do not need more. HR is as we all know a gravy train on fees.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top