It's odd for someone to on one hand, as Pete has, to applaud the direction of new immigration laws which 'allow those to contribute' a way into the UK yet question the right of someone to claim asylum in the 'greatest nation on Earth'.*sigh
For the 100th time, the only way to legally claim asylum in the UK is on UK soil. If you can't get a visa to travel (which as countries are persecuting people enough for them to need to leave isn't going to happen), then they have no legal means of coming to the UK, hence why there is such a trade in people smuggling. Maybe get some of your chief executive chums to do some research on the subject.
Why would one have a greater ability to contribute than the other?
What possible objective measure is being applied that distinguishes one from the other?