Frang
Player Valuation: £70m
Without much foundation you blame everything on the EU. Ergo, prejudice.
I am not pinning everything on the EU. im saying our country isn't exactly revelling in being a part of this EU.
Without much foundation you blame everything on the EU. Ergo, prejudice.
we are debating about Brexit... and the state of the country.
you seem to be taking things to a personal level. no need for it
Some are mate. Some are making a show of themselves.
our government seem to care more about the EU than they do its own population. that is what im getting at.
if its wrong of me to think like that then so be it. but that's how I see it
well I thought the whole country was much better off being in the EU??So why is that the EU's fault?
well I thought the whole country was much better off being in the EU??
am I missing something ??
Well we are about to find out I guess.
Cheers mate.At this point I’m fairly certain that I could get more than half to vote for the U.K leaving the E.U. Simply by factually describing the entire membership.
One of the reasons of why during the sixties the U.K was hoping to join was a) to join in on the prosperity resulting from the abolition of tariffs between member-states b) sabotage: member states were talking about further integration, on an agricultural level etc... . They feared a powerful political block. So the best thing to do was join; that way you could influence the plans or torpedo them.
Maastricht. All the opt-outs, the others wanted a closer union. Cue whining Brits because from then on they complained they were not consulted enough about the political plans from the others – even though they wanted nothing to do with it and in quite a few cases campaigned against. Another fine example of one the dreadful things that Brits opposed: a minimum period of maternity leave (honestly I could go on; a week ago a newspaper published a list of all the things the Brits were against and it went on forever). Everything became a fight.
The U.K championed expansion of the E.U ; again served two purposes: 1) bigger market= more money 2) more member states=more difficult decision making process. Side-effect was off course the Eastern and Central-Europeans in the U.K. Already typed something about that.
I noticed you keep mentioning (I mean this in a neutral way btw) the amount of Brits that the E.U employs atm. One of the many reasons is that, somewhere in the years 2000 the U.K scrapped one of the training programs that had resulted in quite a share of the key civil servant jobs in the E.U going to Brits. Too expensive. Around the same time, they started sending over B quality to work groups.
Or to quote Rodgers if you like (the former E.U ambassador), stating that almost all the instructions he received from London were negative: block this, torpedo that …. Again some things are ironical (and again typical of the Brits in the E.U); one of the things he absolutely had to block was Galileo: guess who wants to participate now… .
Another prime piece of Brit cherry picking. The increasing collaboration concerning departments of justice. Brits opted out. Later on they hand-picked a few cherries though: like the European Arrest Warrant.
So to conclude: U.K out is by far the best solution for everyone involved. Ideally later on a Canada deal, taking into account Ireland. The amount of autographs for that petition is irrelevant.
Now we are in a situation where the knowledge concerning the E.U is at an all-time low amongst U.K civil servants and politicians. Many knowledgeable people have been side-tracked. A lot of the MP’s are proposing solutions that are completely unworkable (they lack knowledge) either politically or legally (mostly the latter). May thought that she could cherry-pick like always … Again Rodgers (one of the few people, actually knowledgeable on the topic), tried to explain to her how the internal market worked. She refused to listen thinking again you could cherry-pick when everyone that knows a bit of European law (an introductory course suffices) knows differently, the poor guy resigned quite quickly. And then somehow the idea became wide-spread that the deal isn’t good (again not a thousand ways to do this). What a show.
or maybe not ….
who the hell knows at this point,.
You seem quite sure everything will be fine. You believe the tripe Fargage and Mogg said.
I took a lesser opinion on those idiots, and I agree, no one has a clue. So surprised you want a leap into the unknown. Because the EU are responsible for UK food banks.
heres a question for Remainers ...
are you very happy at the current way the EU works ??
Has the UK prospered being a member of the EU ??
Has being part of the EU been better or worse than what you expected?
Is there anything you would change about the way we deal with the EU presently ??


heres a question for Remainers ...
are you very happy at the current way the EU works ??
Has the UK prospered being a member of the EU ??
Has being part of the EU been better or worse than what you expected?
Is there anything you would change about the way we deal with the EU presently ??
1. Not really
2. Probably. Veering on certainly
3. Dunno. Was 9 when we joined
4. Dont know. Not that arsed.
One for you.
What is the best bit of being in the EU?
Frank....you are having a ‘mare on this thread.
I feel for you
![]()
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.