Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m pleased, but I’m not sure it helped the Falklands.....I’m also not quite sure why you would throw stones at the Police.....
I’m pleased, but I’m not sure it helped the Falklands.....I’m also not quite sure why you would throw stones at the Police.....
I was just alive for the Falklands, it didn’t register for me truth be told.

..because yellow vests weren’t de rigour then.
 
I’m pleased, but I’m not sure it helped the Falklands.....I’m also not quite sure why you would throw stones at the Police.....

Hmmm, I can't answer for anyone else, but when you see the police/army make your dad stand at the side of the road, barefoot in January while they search his car based on nothing other than his Catholic name, you become motivated. When you see deliberate roadblocks at the gates to gaa games, delaying kick offs by hours it rankles. Or maybe it's the collusion, officially recognised years later but known locally in the 70s and 80s. I could go on...
 
Maggie?! No way. She was a pussycat. A woman of peace and reason. The French are utter bastards for painting her as anything but...
How could a woman obsessed with ruling a couple of small islands thousands of miles away on the other side of the world which are historically part of another country be described as 'imperialist'.

It's just not fair.
 
Am I allowed to point out they were British before Argentina existed as a nation state?
Not sure how you work that out. Argentina gained independence in 1816 and British rule was established in 1833.

However the timeline is immaterial. The point is that they are many thousands of miles away so owning them is imperialist, especially in this day and age.
 
Not sure how you work that out. Argentina gained independence in 1816 and British rule was established in 1833.

However the timeline is immaterial. The point is that they are many thousands of miles away so owning them is imperialist, especially in this day and age.

It's called self-determination, look it up.

If they wanted anything else, we wouldn't hesitate to give them exactly that, like we've proven countless times with the disintegration of the empire.

Calling the Falklands "imperialist" is ridiculous.
 
Indeed. During the Falklands war, even though the USA tried to be politically neutral, from a material point of view they supported the U.K. . Meanwhile France supplied Exocets to the other side......
Rubbish. Are you suggesting that they supplied Exocets during the Falklands War? Yes or no? If no, what's your point?
 
It's called self-determination, look it up.

If they wanted anything else, we wouldn't hesitate to give them exactly that, like we've proven countless times with the disintegration of the empire.

Calling the Falklands "imperialist" is ridiculous.
I don't need to look up 'self-determination'. That's because the people of Ireland expressed their wish for it in the 1918 General Election but were refused and unfortunately had to take up arms instead.

Its far too easy when you have colonised somewhere in the world with your own people to then claim that they are entitled to 'self-determination', irrespective of its geography.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top