Well yeah. I mean I spoke with a bloke from the Estonian government today, and via their E-Residency program they've got a fairly well honed sales pitch to try and attract businesses to that program. If our government wish to 'trade with the world'*, then you would hope they have a similarly honed sales pitch that would define the benefits of being in Britain post-Brexit. If they have such a vision, they're keeping it well hidden, which if things are as rosy as Davis et al no doubt imagine them to be, I'm not sure why they would not shout about our great future from the roof tops.
*I read an interesting study the other day from LSE on the general 'trading with the world' theme. It was looking at noted British companies and exploring not only where they export to, but the trends in those exports. For the bigger companies at least, a surprising number were already trading significantly outside the EU. BAe, for instance, trade significantly more outside Europe than inside it (I think it's 75/25 split or thereabouts).
Now, you could no doubt argue that's an example of the EU being a dying ship, not that important to us and all of that, but it must also surely torpedo this notion that our companies a) are restricted from 'trading with the world' by the EU, and b) once we leave our companies will trade much more as a result. The fact that they already do a significant amount of trade globally would surely cast doubt on both.
