Yeah, stuff you children, Tipp doesn't believe it
Current Affairs Environmental Stuff
- Thread starter orchard
- Start date
- Status
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
Pollution is a different thing altogether..Yeah, stuff you children, Tipp doesn't believe it
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
The actual Experts have been wrong time and time again.. the Maldives was predicted to be under water by 2018 and drinking water in the Maldives was predicted to be gone by 1992 neither happened, but at cop26 we were told we must act now to save the Maldives or it Could be under water by 2100.Or maybe the Smithsonian Institute?
5 major heatwaves in 30 years have turned the Great Barrier Reef into a bleached checkerboard
New research shows just 2% of the Great Barrier Reef remains untouched by bleaching since 1998. Its future survival depends on how much higher we allow global temperatures to rise.theconversation.com
I repeat, again, it's fine to not be a fan of Thumberg and deride her for being a child, but a big part of her patter is that society has ignored actual experts on this issue for decades, and your post is an example of doing just that.
https://www.netzerowatch.com/30-yea...ould-be-swallowed-by-the-sea-it-didnt-happen/
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
Great Barrier Reef in 'recovery window' after year without major heatwaves, cyclone disturbances
The Great Barrier Reef is experiencing a rare window of recovery due to a break in weather and bleaching events according to the latest observations from marine scientists.amp.abc.net.au
I’m not sure it’s as positive as you are making out.
if it helps, the article cited didn't say that the Great Barrier Reef had 'zero prospect' of recovery - they were talking there about parts of the bleached coral, not the whole reef.
How do you think pollution is caused?
This is like Brexit all over again. Experts aren't going to be right all the time, but surely it's better to heed the input of people who spend their life studying something than Jack off the Internet.
I wouldn’t bother mate.
orchard
Player Valuation: £60m
I posted the NASA link covering ice mass loss when he first raised 'his' coldest period thing. That was obviously pointless. He's just looking for anything as an out, whilst there are loads of examples of change, like Siberia and Canada that he's completely ignoring. Obviously tipping points like AMOC changing and permafrost melting (and how the methane reacts)make things unpredictable, and people like this will make hay whilst they can.
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
I know how pollution is caused, we are talking about climate change, not pollution, unless you consider carbon dioxide a pollutant which is what people have been convinced of, even though the ppm in the atmosphere is lower than any time in history.How do you think pollution is caused?
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
If you want to stick your fingers in your ears and yell "la la la I can't hear you" like a 5 year old without debate, then by all means go ahead, but why tell others to do the same? Wah wah wah this person doesn't agree with me I don't want to talk about it..
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
I was asking why it wasn't major news.. like 1 warm day is..
I spoke with the boss of Great Ormond Street a few weeks ago and he and the bosses of other children's hospitals across the country are pushing for movement on climate change precisely because the things that lead to pollution also worsen climate change.
You could pick so many things, from cleaner air, better energy security, cleaner waterways, healthier food, protecting ecosystems, or one of probably many other reasons to do things that will also, the scientists believe, help our climate. It feels like a no brainer tbh.
You’re being obtuse here. The insinuation was clear
orchard
Player Valuation: £60m
1 warm day isn't is it? Was all the sea life washed up in the NE major news?
- Status