Current Affairs Environmental Stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oddball said:
Isn`t that the stuff plants and trees absorb- i heard they emit oxygen after they`ve "breathed" in the "co2" - cool. Imagine if another "living organism" breathed out co2, it would be the perfect symbiotic relationship!
Click to expand...
It would indeed, if the quantities remains balanced.
But as you know, the last 150 years has seen an increase in co2 production coinciding with a reduction in the amount of trees able to convert it to oxygen.

It's almost as if you have hit the nail on the head without realising it.

#Didn'tThinkThatOneThrough
 
WA Toffee said:
Oh, since I am here, I may as well also correct your "science" too

Carbon dioxide is not a hydrocarbon. ?

#YearFiveScienceClass
Click to expand...
Couldn`t resist it could you!.
I`m lumping them all together- in the end it`s all "carbon foot-print" nonsense...anyone up for carbon trading ?
 
Oddball said:
Couldn`t resist it could you!.
I`m lumping them all together- in the end it`s all "carbon foot-print" nonsense...anyone up for carbon trading ?
Click to expand...
How very scientific of you ?

Although to be fair, you originally said you didn't believe any of the climate science, but have now since conceded both the biology and chemistry are correct.

Would be interested to hear you take on the thermodynamic properties of CO2

#We'reAlmostThere
 
WA Toffee said:
It would indeed, if the quantities remains balanced.
1/But as you know, the last 150 years has seen an increase in co2 production 2/ coinciding with a reduction in the amount of trees able to convert it to oxygen.

It's almost as if you have hit the nail on the head without realising it.

#Didn'tThinkThatOneThrough
Click to expand...
1/ Only taking into account the last 150yrs is the biggest mistake that is made in regard to rising temperatures because it doesn`t factor in the mini ice age of the 1700s after which the only place to go was up.
2/ There are more trees now than there were 150 years ago.
3/ Does the WA stand for wrong again? ............hang on a sec and i`ll give it a go

#WrongAgainToffee
 
Oddball said:
1/ Only taking into account the last 150yrs is the biggest mistake that is made in regard to rising temperatures because it doesn`t factor in the mini ice age of the 1700s after which the only place to go was up.
2/ There are more trees now than there were 150 years ago.
3/ Does the WA stand for wrong again? ............hang on a sec and i`ll give it a go

#WrongAgainToffee
Click to expand...
1/ I compared the last 150 years against the rest of time. Only reading two words is the biggest mistake that is made in regard to having a discussion

2/ Not true. Unless you are including 2 saplings as being a greater amount than one fully grown redwood or Eucalypt?

3/ Maybe it is actually WAT offee ?

#MakingThingsUp
 
Oddball said:
1/ Only taking into account the last 150yrs is the biggest mistake that is made in regard to rising temperatures because it doesn`t factor in the mini ice age of the 1700s after which the only place to go was up.
2/ There are more trees now than there were 150 years ago.
3/ Does the WA stand for wrong again? ............hang on a sec and i`ll give it a go

#WrongAgainToffee
Click to expand...
You really are genuinely this thick?! Not an act?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top