Current Affairs Environmental Stuff

[Rita_Poon]

#WhatAboutTheHelicopters

 

[Walken]

I don`t know the science stuff behind CFC`s but i do know that co2 climate warming is an utter crock.
Urban heat islands and habitat destruction are the things that matter but because of corporate/governmental interests the focus is on bleeding the general population dry which is the same as it`s always been.
I`ve posted weather reports with the time stipulated to show you the difference in temperature between cities and open rural areas- it averages out about 4 degrees warmer in cities- multiply that by all conurbations etc and there you have it. We`re literally being blinded by "science" -of the climate kind.

#JustStopCars

Hmmm, if the very basic principles of climate science are a mystery to you, then it seems slighty odd that you consider yourself more informed than the leading climatologists.

 

[Rita_Poon]

Hmmm, when the very basic principles of anything

carousel keeps spinning...

 

[Oddball]

Hmmm, if the very basic principles of climate science are a mystery to you, then it seems slighty odd that you consider yourself more informed than the leading climatologists.

The "leading climatologists"- Who says they are? - the media and the corporate industrial government thats who!
Their models don`t work, which has been proven- but anyway, what about the difference in temperature between cities and open countryside?

 

[Oddball]

carousel keeps spinning...

Hey sister@Poontang, have you read any George Orwell stuff? there`s not too much writing, you`d like them -they`ve full of pictures and everything.

#HmmmPictures

 

[Rita_Poon]

Shambles!

 

[WA Toffee]

I don`t know the science stuff behind CFC`s but i do know that co2 climate warming is an utter crock.
Urban heat islands and habitat destruction are the things that matter but because of corporate/governmental interests the focus is on bleeding the general population dry which is the same as it`s always been.
I`ve posted weather reports with the time stipulated to show you the difference in temperature between cities and open rural areas- it averages out about 4 degrees warmer in cities- multiply that by all conurbations etc and there you have it. We`re literally being blinded by "science" -of the climate kind.

#JustStopCars

I still find it incredible that you don't believe fossil fuels are derived from hydrocarbons.

#YearFiveScienceClass

 

[JimmyJeffers]

I still find it incredible that you don't believe fossil fuels are derived from hydrocarbons.

#YearFiveScienceClass

Someone going around spreading pretty dangerous rhetoric but has time and time again be shown to be woefully uneducated in the subject.
Should keep his trap shut until he can at least form a coherent argument.

 

[Walken]

The "leading climatologists"- Who says they are? - the media and the corporate industrial government thats who!
Their models don`t work, which has been proven- but anyway, what about the difference in temperature between cities and open countryside?

The same as leading medical experts or any number of other fields, from their plethora of accredited qualifications and their peer reviewed research. I'm not sure how many likes their youtube videos got though.

Quite simply you are wrong about the modelling and don't understand the concept.

At a guess simply from your post I would suggest higher temps in urban areas would be down to the albedo of the surface area, convection factors from infrastructure, dense populations and increased pollution along with a few other factors. Regardless it does absolutely nothing to disprove the science behind the carbon cycle, the keeling curve, ozone formulation at both the troposhere and stratosphere, the chemical reactions that take place at these differeing altitudes and their effects, solar radiation its varying wavelengths, the conversion of energy laws, the water balance, thermohaline circulation, global convection weather patters and the biogeochemical proccesses and cycles that contribute the the earths climate. All things that go towards the essential building blocks of understanding climate science.

Without this understanding the idea that you can consider yourself more knowledgable than carl sagan was, is so moronically insane its actually quite hard to comprehend. Its like leaning over the shoulder of a neuro surgeon at work and guessing at what he should do next. If these are genuinley your beliefs then you need to get past your fragile ego because you are heading down a dark rabbit hole of confirmation bias that will see you at best laughed at, and at worst become a very dangerous element of society. If you are a multi who thinks spreading dangerous misinformation is funny because you like chaos, then you are an even bigger tit than if you are real.

I'm not going to respond to your next post so have at it, but I suggest if you have time you make an attempt to return to education and you will see the weak foundations of your belief system. The PROMPT method is a useful when absorbing information, PROMPT criteria (Presentation, Relevance, Objectivity, Method, Provenance, and Timeliness). I suggest you use it and hopefully the reflection you see when shining those windows will look a little different.

Good day and gud luck.

 

[Prevenger17]

The same as leading medical experts or any number of other fields, from their plethora of accredited qualifications and their peer reviewed research. I'm not sure how many likes their youtube videos got though.

Quite simply you are wrong about the modelling and don't understand the concept.

At a guess simply from your post I would suggest higher temps in urban areas would be down to the albedo of the surface area, convection factors from infrastructure, dense populations and increased pollution along with a few other factors. Regardless it does absolutely nothing to disprove the science behind the carbon cycle, the keeling curve, ozone formulation at both the troposhere and stratosphere, the chemical reactions that take place at these differeing altitudes and their effects, solar radiation its varying wavelengths, the conversion of energy laws, the water balance, thermohaline circulation, global convection weather patters and the biogeochemical proccesses and cycles that contribute the the earths climate. All things that go towards the essential building blocks of understanding climate science.

Without this understanding the idea that you can consider yourself more knowledgable than carl sagan was, is so moronically insane its actually quite hard to comprehend. Its like leaning over the shoulder of a neuro surgeon at work and guessing at what he should do next. If these are genuinley your beliefs then you need to get past your fragile ego because you are heading down a dark rabbit hole of confirmation bias that will see you at best laughed at, and at worst become a very dangerous element of society. If you are a multi who thinks spreading dangerous misinformation is funny because you like chaos, then you are an even bigger tit than if you are real.

I'm not going to respond to your next post so have at it, but I suggest if you have time you make an attempt to return to education and you will see the weak foundations of your belief system. The PROMPT method is a useful when absorbing information, PROMPT criteria (Presentation, Relevance, Objectivity, Method, Provenance, and Timeliness). I suggest you use it and hopefully the reflection you see when shining those windows will look a little different.

Good day and gud luck.

Impressive post, Walken. Though I presume you wasted it on the PCP-addled Father of the Year. He will read and understand the same amount of that post as he has Solzhenitsyn

 

[Prevenger17]

 

[Oddball]

The same as leading medical experts or any number of other fields, from their plethora of accredited qualifications and their peer reviewed research. I'm not sure how many likes their youtube videos got though.

Quite simply you are wrong about the modelling and don't understand the concept.

At a guess simply from your post I would suggest higher temps in urban areas would be down to the albedo of the surface area, convection factors from infrastructure, dense populations and increased pollution along with a few other factors. Regardless it does absolutely nothing to disprove the science behind the carbon cycle, the keeling curve, ozone formulation at both the troposhere and stratosphere, the chemical reactions that take place at these differeing altitudes and their effects, solar radiation its varying wavelengths, the conversion of energy laws, the water balance, thermohaline circulation, global convection weather patters and the biogeochemical proccesses and cycles that contribute the the earths climate. All things that go towards the essential building blocks of understanding climate science.

Without this understanding the idea that you can consider yourself more knowledgable than carl sagan was, is so moronically insane its actually quite hard to comprehend. Its like leaning over the shoulder of a neuro surgeon at work and guessing at what he should do next. If these are genuinley your beliefs then you need to get past your fragile ego because you are heading down a dark rabbit hole of confirmation bias that will see you at best laughed at, and at worst become a very dangerous element of society. If you are a multi who thinks spreading dangerous misinformation is funny because you like chaos, then you are an even bigger tit than if you are real.

I'm not going to respond to your next post so have at it, but I suggest if you have time you make an attempt to return to education and you will see the weak foundations of your belief system. The PROMPT method is a useful when absorbing information, PROMPT criteria (Presentation, Relevance, Objectivity, Method, Provenance, and Timeliness). I suggest you use it and hopefully the reflection you see when shining those windows will look a little different.

Good day and gud luck.

If i had this climate warming debate with you in the 1970s, you would be saying the same thing with the added "fear factor" gem of 12 years etc - and as the years have passed the alarmists like yourself have been proved wrong simply by the passage of time and the passing of wind.

#JustStopCars

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Of course he doesn’t agree with the worlds greatest minds.
YouTube though

 

[Oddball]

I still find it incredible that you don't believe fossil fuels are derived from hydrocarbons.

#YearFiveScienceClass

Isn`t that the stuff plants and trees absorb- i heard they emit oxygen after they`ve "breathed" in the "co2" - cool. Imagine if another "living organism" breathed out co2, it would be the perfect symbiotic relationship!

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Isn`t that the stuff plants and trees absorb- i heard they emit oxygen after they`ve "breathed" in the "co2" - cool. Imagine if another "living organism" breathed out co2, it would be the perfect symbiotic relationship!

Honestly,cannot be this thick