ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[Goat]

They've already changed it. In exceptional circumstances they can do something even if the ref did see it. But Defoe's was back in 2006 or something and the rule was the old one then. The Moose tweeted about it on Monday and then got loads of abuse.

Ah right.

At least its been changed.

 

[bluejock]

They've already changed it. In exceptional circumstances they can do something even if the ref did see it. But Defoe's was back in 2006 or something and the rule was the old one then. The Moose tweeted about it on Monday and then got loads of abuse.

He deserves loads of abuse for calling himself Moose the fat f*cking mess.

 

[TippEverton]

I do agree with what they are saying tho.

This rule defo needs changing.

It needs changing, I agree, but they will even argue the rules existence which only goes to show their sheer stupidity by continuously bringing it up.

 

[Goat]

It needs changing, I agree, but they will even argue the rules existence which only goes to show their sheer stupidity by continuously bringing it up.

DEY FA ARE RACIST LAD

 

[neil999]

defoe had no previous and he doesnt 'clamp down' on his arm like suarez did

 

[Goat]

defoe had no previous and he doesnt 'clamp down' on his arm like suarez did

A bite is a bite, but the fact is, the Ref booked Defoe and the rules are the rules.

 

[flibbyflob]

Got to go out for rest of day but when I get back later this evening I may take a sneaky look on RAWK to send me to bed with a smile.

 

[blueser]

rawk meltdown

"Never mind Suarez should leave this country, we should leave this country, the whole club should just **** off and up sticks to Spain and play in their league."

 

[bluebottle]

Very few seem to be actually annoyed at Suarez, the actual reason the FA handed out a ban. Rather than getting angry at those who have to make the decision on his punishment, why not get angry at the person who put them in the position?

 

[Brownie]

They've already changed it. In exceptional circumstances they can do something even if the ref did see it. But Defoe's was back in 2006 or something and the rule was the old one then. The Moose tweeted about it on Monday and then got loads of abuse.

They could back then as well tho, they did it with Ben Thatcher. It's because it's Suarez and his track record, with media scrutiny being more intense than ever, was always gonna be hefty. Once you get a rep you get hammered.

 

[Goat]

rawk meltdown

"Never mind Suarez should leave this country, we should leave this country, the whole club should just **** off and up sticks to Spain and play in their league."

Oh God, YES PLEASE.

 

[Allezfan]

Oh God, YES PLEASE.

Would just be the best thing ever.

 

[Goat]

Very few seem to be actually annoyed at Suarez, the actual reason the FA handed out a ban. Rather than getting angry at those who have to make the decision on his punishment, why not get angry at the person who put them in the position?

My Brother is a Kopite, hes actually the best kopite I know, I text him when it happened, he had nothing but bad words to say about Sewerz, but I think he was fuming cos he had him as Top scorer and would have won loads.

 

[neil999]

A bite is a bite, but the fact is, the Ref booked Defoe and the rules are the rules.

yeah i agree that was why, just that suarez was obviously worse..RAWK seems to think they are exactly the same offence

 

[By god I'm blue]

Turned out quite a good day after all then.