Made some fair points about our failures since 87 (somewhat spoilt by almost airbrushing the 87 title out of history), about how Kendall and Harvey didn't sustain the progress of 84-87 and some of the poor transfer decisions we made (both in and out) but the overall basis of his argument was flawed by his determination to convince himself LFC were bigger, better than Everton. The (objective) reality was that only LFC caused Heysel (sorry - "it was Chelsea") - obviously this was coming and LFC should have had a 10 year ban whilst the rest got perhaps 3 years. (Isn't the deaths of 39 people enough to justify that?).
The hilarity of "Liverpool beating Juventus" (a point he conveniently ignores) thereby earning the right to "certainly defeat" an injury ravaged Everton in the 86 European Cup (they beat us 3-2 at Goodison but lost 2-0 at Anfield) based I think on the 7-2 Screen Sport Super Cup win against Everton Reserves and the FA Cup Final beggars belief.
According to him the CWC was the minor competition. Funny how UEFA arranged the Super Cup between EC and CWC winners and not the UEFA/Europa winners back then, isn't it?