That's roundtable-tastic.A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...
What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).
In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...
What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).
In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...
What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).
In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...
What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).
In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...
What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).
In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
That is one parenthetically enhanced post - to the point of being gibberish. Was it a Brendan quote?
If we had intellect like that on here I'd have an eight pack from all the doubling over.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.