ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.
i was talking to a kopite online playing destiny the other night. General football chat, talking about liverpool a bit and mourinhio and stuff and he came up with two great lines for a red.

1) Gerrard should have retired and he is nowhere near the player he was.

2) We should have signed Luakaku.......
 
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...

What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).


In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
 
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...

What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).


In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.
That's roundtable-tastic.
 
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...

What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).


In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.

Is that a RAWK "like" or rep ffs?
 
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...

What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).


In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.


So THAT'S how to beat the first man
 
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...

What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).


In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.

If we had intellect like that on here I'd have an eight pack from all the doubling over.
 
A response on RAWK to some ones post about taking corners...

What I love the most about your articles, mate, is how you "nod" in the direction of additional or potentially more useful avenues of research (identifying potentially crucial variables for which you have not (yet) located reliable and valid measures, etc) without making your pieces "wishy-washy". They strike a fine balance between the desire and need to generalize (infer to the population from relatively small samples) and the necessity to remain attuned to the concrete and the particular, in light of the realities of the situation (the kind of sport it is, the number of potentially stochastic processes, etc).


In summary - I think he's saying... good post mate.

They failed to put this in,
KknIZsPka0WOrQNbfUoXqdTeyLk_0__NUFZKEzh2M9fI8ZpcWGNWw6p1cx_WgtybLt_qXso=s113


Which generally means that Mr Clever is a genius because he gets Balotelli to defend at corners. But the result from the stochastic process is the same, 'sh*t we've conceded from yet another corner'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top