• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3


Depends if the race has already started and if the PEDS-fuelled favourite is 25 lengths ahead of the other horses who keep falling down.

In that case, perhaps so.

what about the horse that’s on PEDS and has also been matchfixing so each one of its 38 hurdles is slightly lower than the rest?
 
Depends if the race has already started and if the PEDS-fuelled favourite is 25 lengths ahead of the other horses who keep falling down.

In that case, perhaps so.

You'd be mad to award the race to a horse that's got form for bottling really big leads in the past and has a jockey on it who's lost 90% of every big race he's been involved in despite looking fairly decent in minor events.

You'd also have to take into consideration the horse has whacked 4 of the last 5 jumps really hard and there's still a quarter of the race to go.
 

what about the horse that’s on PEDS and has also been matchfixing so each one of its 38 hurdles is slightly lower than the rest?

In that case, you'd say they're a cert to win, albeit contentiously.

You'd be mad to award the race to a horse that's got form for bottling really big leads in the past and has a jockey on it who's lost 90% of every big race he's been involved in despite looking fairly decent in minor events.

You'd also have to take into consideration the horse has whacked 4 of the last 5 jumps really hard and there's still a quarter of the race to go.

This is true. However, the length of lead is unprecedented in horse-racing history.

If said horse could afford to fall, have a short nap, get up and stroll the rest of the way and still win, then that may be something the BHA takes into consideration in it's ruling, whatever that may be.

Perhaps it would be possible to start the race again at a later date with the horses in the same positions (or given head starts in proportion to their lead at the time).
 
So everybody that was saying the league was over in Oct/Nov/Dec now think that it's not over in March, even though the gap is wider than in those previous months?

they’re the best team in the league by a distance and almost certainly wouldn’t have been caught and I know I’m repeating myself but almost certainly doesn’t really butter any parsnips. They hadn’t won the league , just like Devon loch hadn't won or herol Graham didn’t make it to the scorecards . It’s not over until you win and they didn’t win , I find it baffling that anyone struggles to understand it to be honest .

would they have won ? Almost certainly they would have . did they deserve to ? Yes absolutely. Have they ? No . If it’s decided that they can have it then of course they’ll be awarded it and maybe they can have a very bestest ever participation certificate as well.
 

So everybody that was saying the league was over in Oct/Nov/Dec now think that it's not over in March, even though the gap is wider than in those previous months?

people only said that because VAR and the referees practically rendered the season null and void from the moment the first ball was kicked and legitimate goals were being chalked off against Liverpool left right and centre whilst phantom penalties was their top scorer. The whole thing being cancelled would be a suitable end to the biggest rigged sporting event anyone had ever seen.
 
81284


Tomorrow BBC will be doing an article on the story behind the blonde stripe in Sadio Mane's hair. Come on BBC, ffs, every day they produce an article on them, they seem to not care about any other club in Britain. Why don't they talk about the story behind Firminho's racism instead of brushing that under the carpet if they want to talk about him, especially as that'd be related to the article right above from jofra archer.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top