• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
You haven't understood me. Palyer trading is part of a clubs turnover. They turn money over doing it. Turnover = Income in set period of time.

It really is that simple. You're not the brightest chap but it's a simple concept.
@Steve0 they are posts of you including the Coutinho fee in their £465 million turnover.

I and a few others explained to you that Turnover total was Tv, Matchday and Commercial.

Easy to do with the search bar and using certain words in finding said posts.

Anyway i already explained to someone in a post a few pages away that transfer fees are seperate from the turnover tally, as fees are amortisised over a set period of the said contracts and classed in another part of the balance sheet.
 

@Steve0 they are posts of you including the Coutinho fee in their £465 million turnover.

I and a few others explained to you that Turnover total was Tv, Matchday and Commercial.

Easy to do with the search bar and using certain words in finding said posts.

Anyway i already explained to someone in a post a few pages away that transfer fees are seperate from the turnover tally, as fees are amortisised over a set period of the said contracts and classed in another part of the balance sheet.

Transfer sales arent amortised. What does that even mean? They're recognised immediately.

Another simple concept you seem to massively struggle with. Not judging you for it, just saying.
 

Laughing at last night's headlines all about Spurs/City, with tacked on "..and Liverpool go through".

They'll be spitting 'kin blood over that.

It's great to know that they've had a ropey CL campaign full of errors and favourable draws and are now at the SF stage having gained no recognition for it and they'll be webbed all over the shop by Barcelona and out.

They’ll be fuming that Spurs took the limelight last night. They genuinely love media attention more than trophies.
 
No, they just call us bitter, laugh at us for being crap, for booing our own players, the supporter who punched a Lyon player while holding a child, etc. It’s tit for tat nonsense. Dickheads on both sides. Boring as.
No one defended that moron, he got rightly banned , when talking about Liverpool and tit for tat, your half right.
 
You haven't understood me. Palyer trading is part of a clubs turnover. They turn money over doing it. Turnover = Income in set period of time.

It really is that simple. You're not the brightest chap but it's a simple concept.

That really isn't true Steve. Why are you lecturing people about football finances when you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

From our latest accounts.

57059


From the same accounts

57060

Please explain if turnover includes player sales why the Club don't include them in their audited accounts at companies house.
 
No one defended that moron, he got rightly banned , when talking about Liverpool and tit for tat, your half right.

I never said anyone defended him. Why on earth would they? I said the tit for tat nonsense is boring and there are dickheads on both sides. “Murderers”, “Everton wives run for your lives” - is the antithesis of how things were when I was a kid, and I for one think it is frigging rubbish.
 
Last edited:

They’ll be fuming that Spurs took the limelight last night. They genuinely love media attention more than trophies.
The whole Liverpool CL run has been great: an utter mess in the group stages followed by easy KO rounds with zero general interest in them, and now they face an arse kicking from the best team left in the competition by a country mile.
 
That really isn't true Steve. Why are you lecturing people about football finances when you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

From our latest accounts.

View attachment 57059


From the same accounts

View attachment 57060

Please explain if turnover includes player sales why the Club don't include them in their audited accounts at companies house.

Pretending. To. Be. An. Everton. Fan. Online.
 
Transfer sales arent amortised. What does that even mean? They're recognised immediately.

Another simple concept you seem to massively struggle with. Not judging you for it, just saying.
Laymen terms @Steve0 as an example.

The whole transfer fee is spread over the length of the contract and amortization is made yearly. To give an example a player is bought for 50 million pounds over a five year contract, the transfer value is amortized for 10 million pounds every year.

You'll find that clubs do that Steven, it balances the books better and plan better financially knowing you're getting or buying a steady set amount every year from amortization of tranfer fees.
 
Last edited:
Laymen terms @Steve0 as an example.

The whole transfer fee is spread over the length of the contract and amortization is made yearly. To give an example a player is bought for 50 million pounds over a five year contract, the transfer value is amortized for 10 million pounds every year.

To be fair, he said Sales.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top