2025/26 Dwight McNeil

[Eggs]

I’d even prefer aznou as a right midfielder/attacker to this dog.

…behave Nath will ya

 

[Eggs]

He covered 9.69km. For reference Grealish covered 8.52km, Barry 9.10km, Tim 9.38km, Garner 10.64km, Armstrong 10.10km

….good insight, would be worth posting detail like that after every game.

 

[davids]

Ha, I didn't even mean that one. That wasn't a great cross. He did put in a very good one 2nd half ill give him that

If he didn't mean it then why did Tarkowski challenge for it? I mean he dropped the cross right at the far post,if you're saying it was meant for the near post... we'll never know

 

[Toffeepot]

I’d even prefer aznou as a right midfielder/attacker to this dog.

Same
What can be worse than:
Moves going to die at his one foot,
A press that just opens up space,
A treacle wading speed that appears to infect the rest of the squad

 

[f.t.r.s]

Offers nothing currently other than idea sprints, the ones where it looks like you're trying real hard with no chance of getting the ball...

Pretty sure he'd lose a footrace in walking football

 

[matty1878]

Offers nothing currently other than idea sprints, the ones where it looks like you're trying real hard with no chance of getting the ball...

Pretty sure he'd lose a footrace in walking football

oh my god

 

[Taifi gorm]

"Here we watch Dwight McNeil doing the basics right'

 

[wiggytop]

He covered 9.69km. For reference Grealish covered 8.52km, Barry 9.10km, Tim 9.38km, Garner 10.64km, Armstrong 10.10km

Distance isn’t the indication of doing things right, it’s easy to jog aimlessly about and clock up the kms, surely is the impact the kms have, and in McNeils case I’d say it’s none.

 

[NathDogg]

….good insight, would be worth posting detail like that after every game.

Doesn’t tell us anything about Mcbogbrush and his effectiveness on the pitch, or how fast he’s covered the distance.

He’s a really really terrible footballer - that’s the only stat we need to know.

 

[Bluesaint]

….good insight, would be worth posting detail like that after every game.

Go onto sofascore, Eggs, and find the team line ups. Click on the player to see their stats for the game. Some, McNeil very much included, have very poor involvement in games.

 

[Clarky cat]

We are sadly in the justification territory of “he runs about a bit more than some but not as much as others”. What a time to be alive.

 

[Eggs]

Go onto sofascore, Eggs, and find the team line ups. Click on the player to see their stats for the game. Some, McNeil very much included, have very poor involvement in games.

….cheers, Matey, might be worth opening a new thread to consider such stats post-match.

 

[Toffeepot]

He covered 9.69km. For reference Grealish covered 8.52km, Barry 9.10km, Tim 9.38km, Garner 10.64km, Armstrong 10.10km

Running around in circles with his head down doesn't count

 

[AndyP94]

He was trying to get involved and get into space on the edge of the box, particularly in the first half, but most of the play was down the left as you'd expect.

Excluding the set pieces, a lot of the balls he tried to put into the box either hit one of their players, or where just hopeful balls that went straight to the opposition. That's aswell as been dispossessed numerous times. He was alright I thought against Forrest, followed by two poor games, albeit most of the team where poor against Brentford.

We all know he's limited and it really hinders him.

 

[Eggs]

Doesn’t tell us anything about Mcbogbrush and his effectiveness on the pitch, or how fast he’s covered the distance.

He’s a really really terrible footballer - that’s the only stat we need to know.

….ha, ha, we beg to differ on that but it’s still a useful insight for all the players.