he's no more than a confused old man too lazy to wreak any real rot of his own.
He's no Reagan. Or is he?
he's no more than a confused old man too lazy to wreak any real rot of his own.
It would be a disaster for the Democrats, uttter, utter disaster........
He's no Reagan. Or is he?
Indeed. They can't make the same mistake twice, surely...
Hilary isn't running again.
Wouldn't be the first time that promise has been broken
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon's_November_1962_press_conference
I think she'll try, behind the scenes.
And at the very least, they will expect to retain control of the party. That much has been clear for some time already.
Just don't see the point in fretting over something that more than likely won't happen, no matter how incompetent you/we think the Dems are.
Check under your beds for bogeywoman Hillary (Ffs).
Meanwhile, in reality....
No.
Reagan's likewise enfeebled, television-addled brain at least ground to a halt on the Not Nuclear War roulette wheel square (much to the horror of the Team B nutters he'd surrounded himself with)
Trump has probably already threatened to launch a nuke when Kelly doesn't come hither with his hourly can of Coke on time.
The Clintons continuing to dominate the Party is just as bad. They are probably going to lose even Virginia. Did you read the Donna Brazile link I posted? Or the New Yorker one?
It is still the prevailing reality, and not likely to change, certainly not without an enormous fight.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.